#1 Use the resources at your fingertips to see what is already in
progress. A quick search of this mailing list archive or via google
would have uncovered both your requests, and the fact that #2 is done
and in testing (would you like to test it?) and #1 is pretty much also
done as part of #2 in t
At 03:08 PM 10/31/2001, Ship, Howard wrote:
>#1
>
>I only want to install a subset of the packages available. Basically, I
>need a few CVS and SSH related tools.
>
>When I re-run the installer, I would prefer if it remembered which
>packages I had previously installed, and (by default) only selec
#1
I only want to install a subset of the packages available. Basically, I
need a few CVS and SSH related tools.
When I re-run the installer, I would prefer if it remembered which
packages I had previously installed, and (by default) only select
updates to those packages.
Currently, I have to
Johannes Brodwall wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
> convenient. With 80+ packages, ranging from critical (ash), to useful
> (fileutils) to unusable without external help (postgresql - requires
> cygipc), I always end up installing all the pac
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Johannes Brodwall wrote:
>Hi,
>I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
>convenient. With 80+ packages, ranging from critical (ash), to useful
>(fileutils) to unusable without external help (postgresql - requires
>cygipc), I al
Hi David,
can you change the FAQ at
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/faq/faq.html#SEC28 not to add "cygwin" as
term to the google search, but "site:cygwin.com" to narrow the search very
precisely to Cygwin only? The better the search results, the less further
questions arise ... (well, at least f
Hi Andrew,
please keep conversation at the list and send not private mails.
>Sorry Jörg. Certainly I don't read mail archive.
See the FAQ for searching the mail archive:
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/faq/faq.html#SEC28
>About a): Tell me please, where cvs base of setup.exe project?
http://w
I'll add something to the FAQ about this.
Regards,
David
On Friday 26 Oct 01, "Schaible, Jörg" writes:
> Hi Johannes and Andrew,
>
> not again!
>
> >> I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
> >> convenient.
>
> >How about to converting setup.exe in dpkg (or rpm
Hallo Andrew,
2001-10-26 13:01:01, du schriebst:
> Hi all,
> Absolutelly agree with Johannes
> How about to converting setup.exe in dpkg (or rpm) like program, and
> setup.ini in dpkg/rpm format?
Others have tried to port rpm, but there is no easy way to do this.
More easy is to improve setup
Hi Johannes and Andrew,
not again!
>> I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
>> convenient.
>How about to converting setup.exe in dpkg (or rpm) like program, and
>setup.ini in dpkg/rpm format?
did anyone of you searched through the archives of this mailing list?
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [feature-request] Installation Tool: Create profiles
> as meaningful collection of packages
>
>
> Hi,
> I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
> convenient. With 80+ packages, ranging from critical (ash), to useful
Hi,
I have found that personally, the setup.exe installation is not very
convenient. With 80+ packages, ranging from critical (ash), to useful
(fileutils) to unusable without external help (postgresql - requires
cygipc), I always end up installing all the packages available for
simplicity. I cur
This is a re-send due to problems with Exchange (unaccepted MIME formats) and
trying to send with ssmtp (missing return e-mail address and subject line
missing when it's not thanks for the patience.
Cygwin fans,
I've been using Cygwin locally on my own PC for several months. A UNIX use
To whom It May Concern,
I am a new Cygwin user. I want to compile "tdmt_inv" seismology code using
Cygwin. Would you let me know how can I compile the code and if there is
any Cygwin user using this code. Thank you very much.
Best Regards
Pýnar BOLUKBASI
Dear Sir/Madam:
I obtained your contact info from your web site and thought that you might be
interested in our new Sleuth GTA (Toronto) Business Directory software complete with
70 000 contact records, 50 company categories, and full search, reporting, and
importing/exporting capabilities fo
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:10:45AM -0400, Habermann, David (DA) wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Gerald Villemure wrote:
> >> In other words run inetd as a true service in win98 such that I can login
> >> and logout without affecting the inetd process. Somewhat like the VNC
> >
>On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Gerald Villemure wrote:
>> In other words run inetd as a true service in win98 such that I can login
>> and logout without affecting the inetd process. Somewhat like the VNC
>> server dose.
>>
>> One option perhaps would be to introduce a new command in
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Gerald Villemure wrote:
> I would like of great help if I were able to do this:
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunServices]
> "CygwinInetd"="c:\\cygwin\\usr\\sbin\\inetd.exe"
>
> In other words run inetd as a true servi
I would like of great help if I were able to do this:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunServices]
"CygwinInetd"="c:\\cygwin\\usr\\sbin\\inetd.exe"
In other words run inetd as a true service in win98 such that I can login
and logout without affecting the inetd proce
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:32:28PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> > > Recent versions of setup.exe have an option for downloading just the
>> > > source.
>> > > cgf
>> >
>> > That's great... but the most recent version of setup.exe scans what you
>> have
>> > installed, rather than what you have dow
> > > Recent versions of setup.exe have an option for downloading just the
> > > source.
> > > cgf
> >
> > That's great... but the most recent version of setup.exe scans what you
> have
> > installed, rather than what you have downloaded, to build the updated
> > packages list. I think you said yo
- Original Message -
From: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin Maillist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:14 PM
Subject: setup.exe Request
> > Recent versions of setup.exe have an option for downloading just the
>
> Recent versions of setup.exe have an option for downloading just the
> source.
> cgf
That's great... but the most recent version of setup.exe scans what you have
installed, rather than what you have downloaded, to build the updated
packages list. I think you said you had fixed this in CVS... so
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 07:12:11PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>In CVS winsup/cinstall contains setup.exe, but in the
>cygwin-1.3.2-1-src tarball, the cinstall directory is missing from
>winsup. Are there any reasons for excluding it, and if not, could is
>be included in future, please?
There are
In CVS winsup/cinstall contains setup.exe, but in the cygwin-1.3.2-1-src tarball, the
cinstall directory is missing from winsup. Are
there any reasons for excluding it, and if not, could is be included in future, please?
Max.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com
hi !!
i was going through DosDevIOCtl.html page
there in the prog
u have included a file
as
#include "../api/consos2.h"
can u please send it to me
as it is not on ur link
regds,
Bikramjit Singh,
Advanced Technology Center,
HCL Technologies,
244 , Udyog Vihar,
Gurgaon
--
Want to unsubscr
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Alcocer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: clipboard enhancement request-for-discussion
> >>>>&g
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> I'm finding more and more often, that being able to
Robert> redirect things to /dev/clipboard isn't quite enough.
Robert> <-- snip -->
Robert> create a new device /dev/clipfile which when written to
Robert>
I'm finding more and more often, that being able to redirect things to
/dev/clipboard isn't quite enough.
ie emailing patchs really needs a file attachment, not inline text.
I'm considering the following change therefore:
create a new device /dev/clipfile which when written to places a "file"
(
http://cygwin.com/ has the latest version of cygwin. B20 is no longer supported.
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:43:24AM -0700, Masood Khan wrote:
>I need cygwin-b20.1 gnu. Can I download and how.
>
>regards.
>
>=
>Masood Khan
>Ph.D. Scholar
>Department of Mathematics
>Quaid-i-Azam University
>I
I need cygwin-b20.1 gnu. Can I download and how.
regards.
=
Masood Khan
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Mathematics
Quaid-i-Azam University
Islamabad, Pakistan.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request to package maintainers
Hello.
I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please leave
the generated config.cache file in the source package.
I suggest this to aid in rebuilding from source packages. As it is, those
who want to re
riginal configuration?
Thanks for the response.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/25/2001 05:07:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Steve Snyder/SVL/SC/PHILIPS@AMEC
cc:
Subject:Re: Request to package maintainers
Classification:
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PRO
> I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers:
> please leave the generated config.cache file in the source package.
A config.cache from my machine most likely won't work on your machine,
unless you too are building on a Red Hat Linux box with an
i686-pc-cygwi
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:42:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please
>leave the generated config.cache file in the source package.
>
>I suggest this to aid in rebuilding from source packages. As it is,
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please leave the
>generated config.cache file in the source package.
>
> I suggest this to aid in rebuilding from source packages. As it is, those who want
>
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:42 AM
>Subject: Request to package maintainers
>
>Hello.
>
>I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please
Hello.
I would like to make a request of Cygwin's package maintainers: please leave the
generated config.cache file in the source package.
I suggest this to aid in rebuilding from source packages. As it is, those who want to
rebuild there own binaries have no idea what config options
+ patches. There's no need for separate downloads.
Only bugfixes are committed to the squid 2.4 CVS branch.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:29 AM
Subject: Request for Squid 2.4STABLE
Hello.
To the ki
Hello.
To the kind soul who made the cygwin squid-2.4.PRE-STABLE package available:
Would you mind updating this to the current squid-2.4.STABLE + patches
(http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.4/bugs/)?
Thank you.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:07:31PM -0800, Derek Pomery wrote:
^^
Your machine is a month back, somehow.
> Trouble is, no authentication occurred.
You have no password given in your /etc/passwd. That's needed on
W9x to have password authentication. Use `crypt' to create a
pass
No one seems to be on #CygWin on openprojects irc, btw. Is there another
server I should be trying?
Anyway. Sorry for adding yet another help request to a swamped list, but
I've been searching all over the web, the archives, and irc for any similar
experiences, without success.
Problem
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:16:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:50:06PM -0800, James Grishaw wrote:
>>Can someone at Red Hat / Cygnus please provide a status / schedule
>>update on the Cygwin V1.2 release?
>
>1.2 is not a net release and never will be.
>
>>Not meaning
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:50:06PM -0800, James Grishaw wrote:
> Team,
>
> Can someone at Red Hat / Cygnus please provide a status /
> schedule update on the Cygwin V1.2 release?
1.2 is not a net release and never will be.
> Not meaning to push, just trying to find out where we're at.
Team,
Can someone at Red Hat / Cygnus please provide a status /
schedule update on the Cygwin V1.2 release?
Not meaning to push, just trying to find out where we're at.
Many thanks,
Jim Grishaw.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml
Dennis,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:32:34PM -0800, Dennis Wilson wrote:
> I have noticed various mails about building python 2.x. I don't remember
> the names involved, but you have gotten much further than I have.
>
> I have downloaded the Python source in gz format from sourceforge. I chose
>
> From: Dennis Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Python Installation information request
> I have downloaded the Python source in gz format from
> sourceforge. I chose
> the Python 2.0 version. Maybe that is my error.
...
> mv python ../python
...
> ./config
I have noticed various mails about building python 2.x. I don't remember
the names involved, but you have gotten much further than I have.
I have downloaded the Python source in gz format from sourceforge. I chose
the Python 2.0 version. Maybe that is my error.
Anyway, everything compiles fine
Hi,
I've just found the time to look into it.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:01:43PM -0600, CyberZombie wrote:
> > Looks nice. Could you please send me a diff -up? It's way easier
> > to read and apply.
>
> I made one more update to also put the requested port into ssh_config. One
> thing -- shoul
-config Thu Mar 1 02:28:30 2001
+++ /home/root/ssh-newhost-config Sun Mar 4 22:53:30 2001
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ OLDSYSCONFDIR=${OLDPREFIX}/etc
progname=$0
auto_answer=""
+port_number=22
request()
{
@@ -67,6 +68,11 @@ do
auto_answer=no
;;
+ -p | --port )
+port
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 07:18:42PM -0600, CyberZombie wrote:
> Many corporate firewalls don't allow port 22 but do allow other ports (examples
>would be 21 and 80). I've gotten tired of having to manually change my sshd_config
>and services files every time I reconfig at home...so I modified ss
As per a request I not use HTML format, reposting.
- Original Message -
From: CyberZombie
To: Cygwin
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: ssh-host-config change request
Many corporate firewalls don't allow port 22 but do allow other ports
(examples would be 21 and 80).
Many corporate firewalls don't allow port 22 but do
allow other ports (examples would be 21 and 80). I've gotten tired of
having to manually change my sshd_config and services files every time I
reconfig at home...so I modified ssh-host-config to take an optional port
assignment. I have ve
gt; changed from their default values. I can't get make to pay attention to my
> FFLAGS, and will probably have more problems before I have a working
> makefile, so that having an example would save me a lot of fooling around.
> If this is an inappropriate request for this group, ple
rking
makefile, so that having an example would save me a lot of fooling around.
If this is an inappropriate request for this group, please let me know. I'm
sending from hotmail, since there were complaints about the format from our
institutional mail handler after my last message.
You know guys I started this thread and even though more than one person
was agressive with the ** OFF TOPIC ** I got what I needed. A starting
place to read and look. I started with cygwin's site and I was not
finding the answers I needed. But I got around 15 links (Including the
one below)
Hello,
I've been trying unsuccessfully to get Stephen Biggs bind patch since
I saw this email. Since the files are in the incoming directory they
are forbidden to download. I sent Michael Hirmke a request to move
them to a porters directory but he's waiting for a proper readme file
fr
Charles,
> However, if you would like to provide a "Newbie's Guide to Learning Unix
> without leaving the comfort [sic] of Windows, Using Cygwin" feel free.
Actually I can only provide the "windows users Guide to Learning and using
Unix without leaving the comfort of a working Windows environm
Markus -
Yes, cygwin is probably the fastest way for a windowsite to dip a toe in
the unix/gnu/linux world and stay productive in the meantime. Yes,
cygwin may act as a sort of trojan horse, sneaking "the unix way" into
"windows-only" shops.
But that's off-topic for this list.
Cygwin provides
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>I've tried to show you where you could get help which is already available
>on the internet. You can use it or not.
>
>Frankly, it seems to me that if you spent as much time trying to learn how
>to use what you've got as you've put into trying to justify why we sho
Hi Noel !
> Warning, rantings of a tired, bored individual below:
it doesnt sound so, I appreciate that you took the time.
Important: i didnt wanted to praise windows over unix, instead my point
was that [cygwin + working windows environment] is an excellent base
for an experinced windows
Warning, rantings of a tired, bored individual below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.02.13 15:04:48
>1st I have no working shell (only 25 lines, no cut&past, no easy to
>use line buffer like with NT cmd.exe, the keyboard behaves very unexpected
>(home, end, esc, ctrl-left/right, F7..))
CygWin prov
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:04:48PM +0100, Markus Mauhart wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>Michael Kelley wrote:
>> >
>> >I have a basic understanding of C and come from the Mainframe & Windows
>> >environments. I'm not ready to jump straight into Linux/Unix so I see a
>> >great chance to le
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>Michael Kelley wrote:
> >
> >I have a basic understanding of C and come from the Mainframe & Windows
> >environments. I'm not ready to jump straight into Linux/Unix so I see a
> >great chance to learn using Cygwin.
>
> If you're interested in learning about linux/uni
Hi,
When I read Chris' message saying he couldn't reach one of these sites, I
tried them both, had no trouble with either and could see no difference
between them.
To me it appears www.ora.com and www.oreilly.com are aliases (using
Windows' 2K Pro's nslookup from BASH):
-----
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:06:48PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> As I said, Cygwin is not intended to be a beginners entry into the wonderful
>> >> world of UNIX. If you are interested in learning about aspects of UNIX,
>> >> check out www.oreilly.com (the s
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> >>
> >> As I said, Cygwin is not intended to be a beginners entry into the wonderful
> >> world of UNIX. If you are interested in learning about aspects of UNIX,
> >> check out www.oreilly.com (the site appears to be down now, unfortunately)
> >> for a number of boo
Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> Shouldn't it be www.ora.com?
O'Reilly officially changed over from ora.com to oreilly.com at least a
year ago. I've tried it now and then since then -- sometimes it works,
sometimes it doesn't. It's obviously just a redirector to oreilly.com,
judging from how quickly it
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:10:12AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:58:35PM -0700, Michael Kelley wrote:
>> >The main reason for this mailing on this list is not only am I new to
>> >CyGwin but also I am am completely unfamiliar with Cygwin's
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:58:35PM -0700, Michael Kelley wrote:
> >The main reason for this mailing on this list is not only am I new to
> >CyGwin but also I am am completely unfamiliar with Cygwin's originating
> >platform (which I have been led to believe is Linux
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:58:35PM -0700, Michael Kelley wrote:
>The main reason for this mailing on this list is not only am I new to
>CyGwin but also I am am completely unfamiliar with Cygwin's originating
>platform (which I have been led to believe is Linux).
Cygwin is an implementation of
n
to Linux.
I appologize for the unclarity of my request.
But I'm still in the same boat.
I want to learn to use Cygwin to it's fullest.
Where can I get the "How To's" and "What Are's" of Cygwin??
I have a basic understanding of C and come from the Mainframe &
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:12:38PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>< Newbie request for Info: >
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>little bit of OT on this cygwin-list,
>
>> Hey All!!,
>>
>> Can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
< Newbie request for Info: >
Hi Michael,
little bit of OT on this cygwin-list,
> Hey All!!,
>
> Can you point me to "Linux/Unix for beginners" info on the net?
>
> Thanks In Advance for your help.
that's the
Hey All!!,
As stated I'm a newbie to ALL of this. I am no dummy but I have no
experience in Linux/Unix beyond compiling Hello Word in C and in Java on
Unix machines.
Can you point me to "Linux/Unix for beginners" info on the net?
I work for a university so thus I am poor and would prefer online
I think you should read that as
| No thank you, Chris.
"No [we will not build it], thank you [for building and submitting it]"
(Maybe a bit harsh but.. The truth :-)
/Andy
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:53:28PM -0500, Berger, David (SD-EX) wrote:
>I just figured that more tools would enhance the usefulness of Cygwin.
>Perhaps I'm just a little naive.
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC44
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#uns
more tools would enhance the usefulness of Cygwin.
Perhaps I'm just a little naive.
David
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:39 PM
To: David Berger (E-mail)
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: A request
David,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM -0500, Berger, David (SD-EX) wrote:
> I see that you recently added zip and unzip to the Cygwin release. How
> about sharutils and dos2unix/unix2dos? Thank you, David.
The Hany's Dos2Unix converter builds OOTB:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/hd2u/?
Any particular reason why not? David
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A request
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM -0500, Berger, Da
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM -0500, Berger, David (SD-EX) wrote:
>I see that you recently added zip and unzip to the Cygwin release. How
>about sharutils and dos2unix/unix2dos? Thank you, David.
No thank you, Chris.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#
I see that you recently added zip and unzip to the Cygwin release. How
about sharutils and dos2unix/unix2dos? Thank you, David.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
arding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.
#!/bin/sh
#
# ssh-host-config, Copyright 2000, Red Hat Inc.
#
# This file is part of the Cygwin port of OpenSSH.
# Subdirectory where the new package is being installed
PREFIX=/usr
# Directory
No, Perl doesn't *need* the berkeley DB package. Berk-DB is an optional
dependency; if have Berk-db, then make-perl will build the DB_File
module. If you do not have Berk-DB, then perl will just build
everything else, and NOT the DB_File module. No problems.
Better, you can always go back late
Perl 5.6.0 seems to need the Berkeley DB package, albeit version 1 seems to
suffice... but the Berkeley DB package needs Perl... thus a circular
dependency: build the DB version 1 package, install; build Perl, install;
then build the DB 3 package using the just installed Perl, install the DB3
schen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:49 PM
Subject: Request for TESTING: New ssh-host-config and ssh-user-config
scripts
Hi folks,
I have attached two new scripts which shall replace the former
`ssh-config&#x
Hi folks,
I have attached two new scripts which shall replace the former
`ssh-config' script in the next Cygwin OpenSSH version.
The first script is called `ssh-host-config' and creates only the
host configuration in /etc. I added two functionalities:
- It creates a line
sshd 22/tc
On Thursday 01 January 1970 01:00, Eugeny S. Polkovnichenko wrote:
> Dear Cygwin community!
>
> I would like to ask You to tell me the list of Cygwin development
> suite that I have to install to my computer from current directory.
> Thank you in advance.
Don't know exactly what you mean but inst
Dear Cygwin community!
I would like to ask You to tell me the list of Cygwin development suite
that I have to install to my computer from current directory.
Thank you in advance.
My regards,
Eugene
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: setup request:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 04:15:14PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >Setup is the one program t
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 04:15:14PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>Setup is the one program that has a direct link off the cygwin home
>page. I don't think we really need to package it up too. If you ran
>an installed version, you wouldn't be able to install any updates
>because of Windows (this bites
Setup is the one program that has a direct link off the cygwin home
page. I don't think we really need to package it up too. If you ran
an installed version, you wouldn't be able to install any updates
because of Windows (this bites me every time I upgrade bash, because I
run setup from a bash
bert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: setup request:
> > Lazy reason: I have setup, it tells me I can get a new one, why can't I
use
> > it to get the new one :-]
> >
>
> wget ftp://
consideration.
>
>There is a simple solution on all win-os's and filesystems. It is possible
>to clone setup.exe and 're-spawn' it for enabling patches to the main
>executable. I am using such a solution in a similar structured self-updating
>software.
>
>I may pro
s and filesystems. It is possible
to clone setup.exe and 're-spawn' it for enabling patches to the main
executable. I am using such a solution in a similar structured self-updating
software.
I may provide some delphi-source excerpts on request (easy to read'n'port).
armin
-
> Lazy reason: I have setup, it tells me I can get a new one, why
> can't I use it to get the new one :-]
Because windows won't let you overwrite an executable that's currently
running. Besides, we normally advise people to run setup by clicking
on the icon on the cygwin home page, which always
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can setup.exe be put in the list of packages setup can download?
>
No.
> Lazy reason: I have setup, it tells me I can get a new one, why can't I use
> it to get the new one :-]
>
wget ftp://your.favorite.mirror/pub/cygwin/setup.exe
> Obviously
Can setup.exe be put in the list of packages setup can download?
Lazy reason: I have setup, it tells me I can get a new one, why can't I use
it to get the new one :-]
Obviously this is a low priority, but I don't think any source changes to
setup would be needed.
Rob
--
Want to unsubscribe fr
98 matches
Mail list logo
