Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Ummm...they are not broken. You just dislike some stylistic choices...
Well, setup.exe barfs on the. Quoting from inilex.l:
sdesc: return SDESC;
ldesc: return LDESC;
category:return CATEGORY;
requires:
patch? I'd like that to be
included in setup.
Yes, will do.
Thank you. A few nits:
cygwin-installer-20011208.ChangeLog
2001-12-08 Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.in (CFLAGS): Remove -Werror to allow build.
The Werror is in by design. If your patch won't build
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are right: the *setup.ini* grammar as parsed by *setup.exe* requires
colons. However, setup.ini is created on sourceware by a script
called upset. And, the *setup.hint* grammar as parsed by upset
doesn't require colons.
Ah, but it does as
Charles Wilson wrote:
the hints may just be old. Originally, the spec for hint files said
include curr and prev fields. Later, it was changed to that often
causes confusion when folks forget to update the setup.hint. Don't
include curr/prev fields unless you must
Actually (assuming
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Follow to cygwin-patches please.
(oops, let's see if I can post there?)
Thanks for freshening this up. There's still a little more to do, but it
looks good nonetheless.
Ok. Last status was: discussion document (otherwise it would have
gone in :-)
