---BeginMessage---
Jean-Marc Nuzillard wrote:
g++ -c hello.cpp
- g++ not found, took some time to think to try c++
I think at least this part of your problems is due to another bug in
setup.exe 2.194.2.15. (I've looked briefly for relevant discussion here
and on cygwin-apps and seen
Michael's script works for me. One caveat:
I had to manually run 'clean_lst.pl ./a*.lst' 26 times (using different
starting letters). However, that was because I got a BSOD when running
it fullbore -- where it tried to fixup all files.
Now, a perl script should never ever be able to cause a
there were two things I was going to do:
1) move gettext from the contrib directory to the latest directory --
and see if anybody barfs.
2) update bzip2 to the latest release -- which involves the grand
library split thing (bzip2 - bzip2 + libbz2_0). However, the name
libbz2_0 is
Sigh. Well I'm nearly back on deck. (Long story).
I'll look into this today, I hope.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: setup.exe problem [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: no exec
Holdoff please Chuck,
cgf's forwarded post here indicates that there is still at least
one serious bug in 2.194...
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Now that the new
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: prev/curr/test
I think I've seen the light.
...
I think that Robert is right that if you click on test you
should only get
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:11:45AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
I just meant that I am extremely unlikely to agree with you
on this one. So, I won't be willing to let setup grow in this
direction. I would not blame you if you felt that your
creativity was being hampered.
If the decision
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:21 AM
Hmm. I think that unclicking bin should uninstall - leaving it there
would be counter-intuititive.
If you have the word install next to a box, I don't think it
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:25 AM
I'm actually in the position of being a pretty normal cygwin
user right now. No time, just amazingly good ideas. I'll
try to generate the appropriate resentment if
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:33:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
I'm actually in the position of being a pretty normal cygwin
user right now. No time, just amazingly good ideas. I'll
try to generate the appropriate resentment if no one acts on
my ideas in the next day or so.
Oh... well I
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:31:22AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Tick Bin to install foo. Untick Bin to remove foo. Tick Source to
trigger a download of the source (download only mode) or extraction
(install from x mode).
And when you just don't want a package? What do you click to
get
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:02:17PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
evil and should be abolished. The only way to get old versions should
be at a macro level. You click a button and get all of the old stuff,
you click another button and get all of the current stuff, you
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: prev/curr/test
And when you just don't want a package? What do you click to
get the equivalent of skip?
Don't click either?
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Sorry, but I really don't like this. Adding a whole bunch of new things
for a user to cycle through (or even select from a pulldown) is moving
in the wrong direction, IMO.
But a big deal at one point in time was the ability to get to packages/versions
that were in
Um. Could you guys stop Cc'ing me, please.
I don't know how my name got on the Cc list but please remove it.
I set the Reply-To for a reason.
cgf
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:27:04PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Sorry, but I really don't like this. Adding a whole bunch of new
things for a user to cycle through (or even select from a pulldown) is
moving in the wrong direction, IMO.
But a big deal at one point in time
requires: ash cygwin libintl1 ncurses pcre
almost nothing actually depends on the ncurses package. the dependency
is probably on the libncurses6 and/or terminfo packages.
Thanks. I actually edited a copy of grep's .hint, FYI.
grep doesn't have an ncurses dependency.
Yes, I added
17 matches
Mail list logo
