Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email
from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the
problem and responded, but no word since.
--
Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks
Senior System Administrator -
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:06:55AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email
from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the
problem and responded, but no word since.
I've uploaded it to the contrib area. I
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
As tetex-beta-20001218-4 (now in curr) and texmf-*-2804-2 seem to
work well together, can we remove the test marker from texmf?
You are the maintainer; it is your decision.
I
thought there was a three weeks period for test; who's keeping track
of
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:24:53AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
The -src package is incorrected packaged:
usr/doc/Cygwin/
usr/doc/Cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6.README
usr/src/
usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/
usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/Banners.Makefile
usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/BLURB
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Also, the way that things are coded for choosing
multiple mirror sites I could have the same file in more than one
directory in the cache. Ouch, that bites.
I don't think that will happen. Of all of the versions of project 'bob'
on all of the download sites, only the
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Also, the name should be 'tcp_wrappers-7.6-REL...'; the package release
version is missing.
Agh! I'm sorry. I'm still not really back from vacation, apparently.
Can I remove the package and keep the directory and setup.exe is still
happy?
Sure -- I've
I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libtool, so I
have a lot of mods to make that happen, if I understood cgf right.
I get cable modem today so I will be able to do more from home now ;)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:06:55AM
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libtool, so I
have a lot of mods to make that happen, if I understood cgf right.
I don't remember saying this.
It *should* be as simple as saying
gcc
I've whipped up a repackaged version of your -src, that follows the
approved conventions. Also, it uses a shell script to control building,
and installs the man pages, header file, has a postinstall script to
create /etc/hosts.allow/deny if they dont already exist, etc.
I'll mail it to you
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 01:28:25PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
I've whipped up a repackaged version of your -src, that follows the
approved conventions. Also, it uses a shell script to control building,
and installs the man pages, header file, has a postinstall script to
create
wh, I am going to have fun this weekend ;)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Charles Wilson wrote:
Mostly correct. Unfortnately, libwrap is bad. It uses an int
(allow_severity and deny_severity) that are expected to be defined in
the application (so, tcpd.h says 'extern int allow_severity').
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:53:23PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Ok, maybe I just misunderstood your replies to someone asking for
dll'ization or maybe it was you who asked for it. Basically, here is
the situation, TCP Wrappers only has a single Makefile, no configure or
libtool (understand, I am
12 matches
Mail list logo
