RE: ready to push setup.exe to release

-Original Message- From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 1:53 AM To: Cygwin-Apps Subject: RE: ready to push setup.exe to release Any objections to making the latest snapshot a release? None here if the latest snapshot == current

setup.bz2

setup.exe (HEAD) will now grab setup.bz2 in preference to setup.ini, with a fallback to setup.ini. I've done this to aid modem users, and multi-site users. I compressed a test copy to the cygwin ftp site (I hope that was an ok thing to do Chris), and it should it mirrors soon. The savings are

Re: URL paths in setup.exe

[Resending to list] Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:55 PM file:///d/foo/bar.txt on Cygwin should work as well depending on the cygdrive value. ;) file:///d:/foo/bar.txt should be the

Re: setup.bz2

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:53:15AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: setup.exe (HEAD) will now grab setup.bz2 in preference to setup.ini, with a fallback to setup.ini. I've done this to aid modem users, and multi-site users. I compressed a test copy to the cygwin ftp site (I hope that was an ok thing

setup.exe updated

Ok, I've copied across the new setup. As there are no new features (other than not crashing as much :}) I don't think this warrants an announcement. Rob

Re: setup.exe updated

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: I've copied across the new setup. As there are no new features (other than not crashing as much :}) I don't think this warrants an announcement. Does this version understand bzip2 files? It occurred to me that I don't really have

RE: setup.exe updated

-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setup.exe updated On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: I've copied across the new setup. As there are no

Re: setup.exe updated

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:36:06PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setup.exe updated On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:23PM +1000, Robert

RE: setup.exe updated

Sure. I'd not intended to remove the setup.ini processing capability from setup.exe for any current reason. (The fallback takes all of , oh, 3 lines) :]. Rob -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: setup.exe updated

I just noticed that the UCX compression breaks upset's ability to detect the setup.exe version. So, it's still being reported as 2.194.2.26 in setup.ini. Is there any way to make UCX not compress the embedded version string? cgf

Re: setup.exe updated

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 12:58:21AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 12:55:48AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I just noticed that the UCX compression breaks upset's ability to detect the setup.exe version. So, it's still being reported as 2.194.2.26 in setup.ini. Is

RE: setup.exe updated

What is the upset detection logic? Rob -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setup.exe updated I just noticed that the UCX compression breaks upset's ability to detect the

RE: setup.exe updated

-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 3:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setup.exe updated On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 12:58:21AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 12:55:48AM -0400,