RE: Checked branch setup.exe changes into trunk

2002-05-15 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Checked branch setup.exe changes into trunk It looks like all of the changes I made to the branch are applicable to the trunk as well.

RE: Setup 2.218.2.6 [Was: Re: Setup 2.218.2.4] (new version uploaded)

2002-05-15 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:55 AM The attached patch seems to fix this and some other problems. I've uploaded a new version to sourceware. At least some of the below should be useful on the trunk,

RE: upset now understands 'external-source' option

2002-05-15 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upset now understands 'external-source' option Christopher Faylor wrote: Anyone want to submit the corresponding web page

RE: [PATCH]: cygpath.cc

2002-05-15 Thread Schaible, Jorg
Hi Chris, you should have one from late 1999 or beginning of 2000 ... Regards, Jorg -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH]: cygpath.cc On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:55:37AM

Re: [PATCH]: cygpath.cc

2002-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:55:37AM +0200, Schaible, Jörg wrote: Hello, cygpath now supports an option -H that can be used to retrieve the Windows' profile diretcory root. Mapping this directory to /home you can achieve a Unix like schema /home/username and gain support for roaming profiles.

Re: Checked branch setup.exe changes into trunk

2002-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Checking for \\setup.ini should be enough as long as / is never returned by the find function. I'll do something like this in HEAD soon. I changed the find function to use \ since I seem to recall that some versions of Windows had

Re: setup releases

2002-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:36:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: The last couple of setup.exe uploads you've done have been faulty in one way or another - linked against cygwin1.dll, not stripped. I've already explained why I linked against cygwin. IMO, your configury is badly BADLY broken, at

new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-15 Thread Teun Burgers
Hello, I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL, homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/ These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs: http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1.tar.bz2 The tarballs were

Re: diff and diff-utils in category base

2002-05-15 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
Robert Collins wrote: Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category? They seem much more 'devel' to me. I hate to always be a pain about 'base', but I use diff for a lot of non-devel things. Lists of name with duplicates that you only need the duplicates, for example: # uniq

Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Teun Burgers wrote: Hello, I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL, homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/ These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs: http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: Question on submitting a package to cygwin

2002-05-15 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote: Uhm, Utils comes to mind. Thanks for the response! I considdered that, but it's not quite a utility. Tools like diff or sed or awk, those are utilities, but a 3270 emulator... I couldn't quite make myself categorize it as such. Ask yourself, would

RE: Question on submitting a package to cygwin

2002-05-15 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Peter A. Castro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:57 AM I'd like to submit couple of packages that I've built under Cygwin, but I'm at a loss as to a proper category. ... It's

RE: Question on submitting a package to cygwin

2002-05-15 Thread Harold Hunt
Peter, Chris Faylor had said that apps that run under X need to go in the XFree86 directory... but I'm not sure if that means that it should be stuffed into the XFree86 category as well: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00538.html Does x3270 only have an X component or does it run

RE: Question on submitting a package to cygwin

2002-05-15 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Harold Hunt wrote: Peter, Chris Faylor had said that apps that run under X need to go in the XFree86 directory... but I'm not sure if that means that it should be stuffed into the XFree86 category as well: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00538.html

Re: New Packages Waiting! [WAS: New SGML/XML packages]

2002-05-15 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Robert, Am Dienstag, 14. Mai 2002 um 13:39 schriebst du: I think no-one has had time. I recall several yea votes previously, so it just takes me/corinna/chris/chuck/ anyone else with write access to upload the packages. I don't recall who (if anyone) has sanity checked the packages

[PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running

2002-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
Here is a fix for the problem of postinstall not running. I'm not going to check this one into the trunk because it uses a static variable and feels wrong as a result. I think we probably need to change the find interface, either to just return the relative path or the full path as needed. I