Sorry for the excessive mailing related to this, it's my first shot at
getting a cygwin package...
Anyway, I didn't like the process that xdrive provided for third party
retrieval of files and yahoo briefcase wouldn't let me share files either.
I put all the files on a single server for consiste
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:01:17PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Not sure if this is the best place to ask,
It's as good a place as any.
>but could someone remove the exim entry from
>http://www.cygwin.com/ported.html now that it is in setup? That link
>is now obsolete.
I'll remove the link
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 03:00, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Would someone kindly upload a new version of curl to the sourceware mirrors for me?
>
> Anyone... Robert? Corinna? Jason? CGF? Buehler?
>
> I don't mean to be a pest, but I've requested this twice already over the last
>couple weeks and have
Not sure if this is the best place to ask,
but could someone remove the exim entry from
http://www.cygwin.com/ported.html
now that it is in setup? That link is now obsolete.
Thanks
Pierre
Same links apply for the packages themselves, the source package is on a
different site due to space limitations on all the other places that I know
of...
https://plus.xdrive.com/s/804283208Fy53FcN9QeLkMTBhBPt&partner=xdrv
click on the "Download" button, then double check the download filename...
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:44:56PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Kevin,
>
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:00:31PM -0400, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
>> Would someone kindly upload a new version of curl to the sourceware
>> mirrors for me?
>>
>> Anyone... Robert? Corinna? Jason? CGF? Buehler?
>
>I was about
Kevin,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:00:31PM -0400, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Would someone kindly upload a new version of curl to the sourceware
> mirrors for me?
>
> Anyone... Robert? Corinna? Jason? CGF? Buehler?
I was about to do the above, but it appears that Chris beat me to it.
However, (I th
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Abraham Backus wrote:
>
>> http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
>>
>> http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
>>
>> I also have a source tar.bz2, but it is just over the 5M limit on any
>> of the public web servers t
Abraham Backus wrote:
> http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
>
> http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
>
> I also have a source tar.bz2, but it is just over the 5M limit on any of
> the public web servers that I have access to :) If anyone
http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
http://www.mycgiserver.com/~abackus/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
I also have a source tar.bz2, but it is just over
the 5M limit on any of the public web servers that I have access to :) If
anyone knows where I can drop it, let
Would someone kindly upload a new version of curl to the sourceware mirrors for me?
Anyone... Robert? Corinna? Jason? CGF? Buehler?
I don't mean to be a pest, but I've requested this twice already over the last couple
weeks and have seen no response. If my repackaging is not correct or should n
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the
>>> link still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and
>>> 'g++-2' respectively in the suggested configure options... I
>>>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the
> >> link still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and
> >> 'g++-2' respectively in the suggested configure options... I
> >> suppose the bu
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the
>> link still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and
>> 'g++-2' respectively in the suggested configure options... I
>> suppose the build would have worked with gcc2, as long as the rig
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:17:05PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:30PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >It isn't. I tried compiling it, failed miserably, had to revert to
>> >gcc-2.95, but couldn't get the righ
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:30PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >It isn't. I tried compiling it, failed miserably, had to revert to
> >gcc-2.95, but couldn't get the right gcc-mingw back... As it is, it only
> >fails at the link stage. Hope
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:30PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>It isn't. I tried compiling it, failed miserably, had to revert to
>gcc-2.95, but couldn't get the right gcc-mingw back... As it is, it only
>fails at the link stage. Hopefully, extracting libstdc++.a will resolve
>that. Thank
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >
> >> Brian Keener wrote:
> >>> On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it to
> >>> compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not
> >>> sure
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:40:48PM +0200, Serge Lamikhov-Center wrote:
>Can you think of any good reason why acronyms should be in lower case?
>Is not it an author's right to name a product?
I didn't realize that you were the original author. Yes, it is an
author's right to do so.
I've moved th
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>> Brian Keener wrote:
>>> On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it to
>>> compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not
>>> sure if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do yo
Can you think of any good reason why acronyms should be in lower case?
Is not it an author's right to name a product?
Serge
>From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: "ELFIO"
>Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:14 -0400
>
>I can't thin
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
>
>
>>Updated.
>>
>
>
>http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxygen-1.2.18-1-package.tgz
>
> I downloaded the package twice (just to be sure) but it is an old package
> - maybe you forgot to r
Oops, sorry, forgot to change the subject line...
Igor
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 05:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [setup] (Accidental?) Change in sor
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Brian Keener wrote:
> > On a side note - Max - did you have to make any changes to get it to
> > compile - for some reason - my compile is now broken and I am not sure
> > if it is the gcc3 install or the mingw changes. Do you have any
> > ideas?
>
> Cyg
24 matches
Mail list logo
