Re: UPX updated to 1.24

2002-12-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote: I just prepared package for new UPX 1.24. Same usual address: http://www.lapo.it/tmp/upx-1.24-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.lapo.it/tmp/upx-1.24-1.tar.bz2 Uploaded. I've removed the 1.20-1 packages. Lapo, there was no announcement for this

Pending packages status

2002-12-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
1. xinetd version: 2.3.9-1 status : reviewed; ready for upload (?!) notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00069.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00249.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-12/msg00114.html reviews:

GSL version 1.3

2002-12-24 Thread Teun Burgers
Hello, I've uploaded binary and source packages of version 1.3 of the GSL (GNU Scientific Library). The homepage for the GSL is http://www.fsf.org/software/gsl/ This replaces the current 1.1.1 version. These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:

Setup proposal: Maintainer Features #define and AC_ARG_ENABLE

2002-12-24 Thread Max Bowsher
I'd like to resubmit my 'alternative registry name' patch for setup. It's not something that should go into released versions, but is the kind of thing that a maintainer is likely to find useful. I'd like to have a new #define (say MAINTAINER_FEATURES) and AC_ARG_ENABLE (say

Re: Setup proposal: Maintainer Features #define and AC_ARG_ENABLE

2002-12-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 10:45, Robert Collins wrote: Secondly, maintainer only features should not be visible as configure arguments - add them to your CXXFLAGS command line parameter, or tweak Makefile.am. The reason for this is that users *will* turn on configure parameters in the assumption

Re: Setup proposal: Maintainer Features #define and AC_ARG_ENABLE

2002-12-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 10:39, Max Bowsher wrote: I'd like to resubmit my 'alternative registry name' patch for setup. It's not something that should go into released versions, but is the kind of thing that a maintainer is likely to find useful. I'd like to have a new

Re: Setup proposal: Maintainer Features #define and AC_ARG_ENABLE

2002-12-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 11:02, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: I suggest it be used for enabling the existence of the alternate registry name command line option and any other future additions of this sort. It is different from DEBUG, because DEBUG features impede the use of the