Project http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/joe.html has been
ported. Please review. I personally like joe because it includes
'jmacs', a joe Emacs keybinding emulation.
Jari
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/joe/joe-2.8-1-src.tar.bz2
Joe requires ncurses too, isn't it?
Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jari Aalto+mail.emacs
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 7:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: joe-2.8 - a new package for review
Project
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 15:53, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Finally got a chance to try this:
Does it interact (worsely) with large/small font settings. And so
on.
Doesn't interact at all here from what I can tell, but I never had the problem
before either.
Ditto.
The exact point of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
drwxr-xr-x root/None 0 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/
-rw-r--r-- root/None 17169 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/joerc
-rw-r--r-- root/None 16344 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/jmacsrc
-rw-r--r-- root/None 15142 2003-07-04
Hello John,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
drwxr-xr-x root/None 0 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/
-rw-r--r-- root/None 17169 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/joerc
[...]
These would be better copied into position by a postinstall script
if they don't already exist.
Jari schrieb:
Project http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/joe.html has been
ported. Please review. I personally like joe because it includes
'jmacs', a joe Emacs keybinding emulation.
The official JOE website is: http://sourceforge.net/projects/joe-editor/
The latest version is:
From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello John,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
drwxr-xr-x root/None 0 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/
-rw-r--r-- root/None 17169 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/joerc
[...]
These would be better copied into
*** Elfyn McBratney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Jul 3, 2003:
:) I've started seeing two application requiring the header `rfc822.h'
:) from the c-client. Would is be possible for you (Abraham?) to put this
:) header in your next update?
Something worth investigating though is if that particular
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
*** Elfyn McBratney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Jul 3, 2003:
:) I've started seeing two application requiring the header `rfc822.h'
:) from the c-client. Would is be possible for you (Abraham?) to put this
:) header in your next update?
Something
