Re: [setup PATCH] Add some log msgs to installOneSource

2003-07-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 20:11, Max Bowsher wrote: This isn't an error. It's simply the automagic compressed archive detection. The message could be clearer, but it is valuable info to know whether the docompress or the dearchive failed. How about: if (tmp) { /* Existing code */ } else {

setup suggestion: obsolete

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Sorry if I'm missing something already implemented but this idea just occured to me and I thought I should write it down before I forget it again. Currently, if a new package foobar is build which overrides package foo, some extra work is needed, e.g. creating an empty foo package with a new

Re: setup suggestion: obsolete

2003-07-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 22:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Do we have something like that already? Or would that be hard to implement? Any other comment besides go away? Replaces: We already parse this, but the logic isn't implemented. It's on my eventual TODO. Difficulty? Haven't gotten

Re: setup suggestion: obsolete

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:35:41PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Replaces: Ah, cool. We already parse this, but the logic isn't implemented. It's on my eventual TODO. Difficulty? Haven't gotten close enough to estimate that. Probably not hard. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

TEST: tcsh-6.12.00-6

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi, I've uploaded the 64 bit version of tcsh, 6.12.00-6, marked as test. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.

TEST: tin-1.6.0-1

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi, I've uploaded the 64 bit version of tin, 1.6.0-1, marked as test. This is an entirely new version of tin. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.

TEST: vim-6.2-2

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi, I've uploaded the 64 bit version of vim, 6.2-2, marked as test. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.

Re: 1.5.0 Test packages status

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Elfyn, On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: Current available 'test' packages (version) cygipc2.00-2 cygutils

[setup PATCH] Add log msgs to Installer::installOneSource (Take 2)

2003-07-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /home/max/cvsmirror/cygwin-apps-cvs/setup/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 2.367 diff -u -p -r2.367 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 11 Jul 2003 22:48:13 - 2.367 +++ ChangeLog 16 Jul 2003 13:13:00 - @@

Re: 1.5.0 Test packages status

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Elfyn, On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: Current available 'test' packages (version) cygipc

Re: 1.5.0 Test packages status

2003-07-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:23:47PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: any chance to get this together with the list of *not* available packages in the first place? I know that looks like redundant information but I have that feeling it's easier to

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ) OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather ) oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not ) contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the short ) term fix. Long term, maybe

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the short term fix. Long term, maybe setup could

Re: SetupXP

2003-07-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Hi Gary, More stuff to decrease the size of your diff: I think you are only supposed to update Copyright comments when you actually change something in a file? Unless I am wrong, please drop your copyright-comment-only change to splash.h from your local mods. Please rm ChangeLog.window.txt,

Re: TEST(1.5.0): uw-imap 2002d-2 and c-client 2002d-2

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Abe Backus wrote: This is identical to the uw-imap 2002d-1 just announced, except that it's built against the test openssl-devel and cygwin 1.5.0. Uploaded. Please send an announcement in a couple of hours. Thanks, Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB |

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Max Bowsher
Daniel Reed wrote: On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ) OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather ) oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not ) contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the short ) term

Re: SetupXP

2003-07-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 00:46, Max Bowsher wrote: Hi Gary, Please add the following to your generated files filter when making your tarball: inilex.cc iniparse.cc iniparse.h res.aps setup_version.c Setup.aep Setup.aew Setup.dev Setup.dev.bak Setup.layout Don't tarball by hand. Use make

/etc/mlock.exe (was Re: TEST(1.5.0): uw-imap...)

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Abe Backus wrote: This is identical to the uw-imap 2002d-1 just announced, except that it's built against the test openssl-devel and cygwin 1.5.0. Abe, I noticed this a while ago and it didn't register. Sorry to do this

1.5.0 Test packages status (issue 2)

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
Current available 'test' packages (version) ash 20020731-2 bash2.05b-11 cygipc

Re: 1.5.0 Test packages status (issue 2)

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Missed termcap Ok [... going over my dependencies again] and what about XFree86-bin? The Cygwin/XFree people manage their own releases and will (most likely) be performing tests after this period.

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now, ) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my head, I'm wondering if the ) symlinks in the tarball could be confusing something. If I try

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote: On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now, ) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my head, I'm wondering if the ) symlinks in the tarball could

Re: naim review (was Re: Pending package status (14 Jul 2003))

2003-07-16 Thread Earnie Boyd
I noticed that the release directory from mirrors.rcn.net is empty just now. Earnie. Daniel Reed wrote: On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now, ) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my

RE: /etc/mlock.exe

2003-07-16 Thread Abe Backus
Good question. I don't know a heck of a lot about the file and whether it's used at all. There's some info about it in the UW-imap faq http://www.washington.edu/imap/IMAP-FAQs/index.html#7.10. The file location is based on the information about a default location provided there. I don't mind

RE: SetupXP

2003-07-16 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 00:46, Max Bowsher wrote: Hi Gary, Please add the following to your generated files filter when making your tarball: inilex.cc iniparse.cc iniparse.h res.aps setup_version.c Setup.aep Setup.aew Setup.dev Setup.dev.bak Setup.layout Don't tarball by hand. Use

Re: [Ready for test/1.5.0] libiconv gettext (many)

2003-07-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Real fix: figure out why sharutils thinks it needs access to that variable, and use the public API to do the same thing. If possible. shar just uses the value to print it to stdout if the option

RE: SetupXP

2003-07-16 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Hi Gary, More stuff to decrease the size of your diff: I think you are only supposed to update Copyright comments when you actually change something in a file? Unless I am wrong, please drop your copyright-comment-only change to splash.h from your local mods. No, I know, I noticed that

RE: SetupXP

2003-07-16 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[snip] Seems I spoke too soon. The diff is still messy in parts. Oh I know. I'm not submitting anything for inclusion yet, just trying to get some general feedback. First, please drop -r HEAD from your diff command. All that accomplishes is to make the generated patch *revert all changes