Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of version 3.4 of gnugo.
This version is an update of the current 3.2. 3.4 depends on
libncurses7 as pointed out by Charles Wilson in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00135.html.
The tarballs are here:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 05:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
According to the MS docs, FreeResource is an obsolete 16-bit
compatibility
function. Do we really want/need to use it?
MS recommend using DeleteIcon etc rather than it for new code - and
yes, its nice to free
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 09:12, Max Bowsher wrote:
Now, I don't think moving 2 lines of code and 4 lines of comments into a
seperate function makes this clearer - rather, it obfuscates what is
happening here.
In case you are not convinced, here is the alternate patch, to avoid another
So this puts a small icon in the top left - like most programs have?
Does it ever! Gets it into the button thing in the taskbar too when you
minimize it; that was spotty in a similar way to the scrolly-wheel, some
machines it was there, some it wasn't.
Cool.
See what you've been missing?
2003-08-02 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ChangeLog: Fix broken line-wrapping throughout. Remove Ran
automake from 2003-07-26 entry - since there are no generated files
stored in cvs, this was neither a change, nor needed to be logged.
Patch not sent, since it is long
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
See what you've been missing? Have you even looked at my
not-entirely-uncool
page dedicated to Cygwin setup? There's an old friend there waiting to
greet
you ;-)!
http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/setup/
Approved,
Thanks again Max.
No problem. And
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 05:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
According to the MS docs, FreeResource is an obsolete 16-bit
compatibility
function. Do we really want/need to use it?
MS recommend using DeleteIcon etc rather than it for new code - and
yes,
+2003-08-02 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * propsheet.cc (Copyright): Update copyright dates.
+ (PropSheet::PropSheet): Remove NumPropPages initialization.
+ (PropSheet::CreatePages): Use PropertyPages.size() instead of
+ NumPropPages.
+ (PropSheet::Create): Ditto.
+
Hi all,
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 05:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
According to the MS docs, FreeResource is an obsolete 16-bit
compatibility function. Do we really want/need to use it?
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MS recommend using DeleteIcon etc rather than it for new code - and
yes,
I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on
2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal?
cgf
I have noticed interesting thing with 2.340.2.5 setup.exe
1. remove /usr/src
2. symlink it to some other partition
(current locaton ran out of space)
3. start setup.exe
4. Update packages
The setup.exe has created hard wired /usr/src and the symlink
is
Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote:
I have noticed interesting thing with 2.340.2.5 setup.exe
1. remove /usr/src
2. symlink it to some other partition
(current locaton ran out of space)
3. start setup.exe
4. Update packages
The setup.exe has created hard
Nicholas,
That is precisely the kind of info I wanted to see. You really went
over and above the call of duty on this one.
I am all for breaking them out into seperate packages. You have my
approval to go ahead with this. We will need to coordinate some testing
of your new packages with my
Hallo Christopher,
Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du:
I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on
2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal?
I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet.
I'm seeking for volunteers to help tracking
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du:
I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on 2003-08-23.
Are there any obstacles to that goal?
I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet.
I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo
