This is the list of pending packages as of Tuesday, January 6, 2004.
** PACKAGE PROPOSERS ** Please verify these fields **
Package: The name and version of the package as it will appear in setup.
Proposal: Files that will be uploaded to sources.redhat.com unmodified.
HOLD-UPS: What you need to
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
I would like to contribute and maintain the LDAP libraries and clients
from the openldap package.
I vote pro.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a small package but one I hope will enable me (and perhaps
others) to contribute various SGML DTDs in a FHS-compliant way.
This is version 1.1-1 since there was a proposal about 2 years ago and
the 1.01-1 packages are floating around.
It is mainly a single perl
Hallo Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2004 um 18:00 schriebst du:
This is the list of pending packages as of Tuesday, January 6, 2004.
[...]
Problems can be addressed either by announcing an updated version or explaining
why the problem is not an issue.
Hallo Nicholas,
Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2004 um 19:47 schriebst du:
2) As I mentioned, I have a working OpenSP/openjade. The main problem
is the prolific use of that [EMAIL PROTECTED] broken g++ #pragma (the same one
that breaks mysql builds) in OpenSP. Also, there are some other dumb
c++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a small package but one I hope will enable me (and perhaps
others) to contribute various SGML DTDs in a FHS-compliant way.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:47:51PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Thank You
Thanks to everyone willing to discuss this. Like
Yes, the links were just to explain that /etc/sgml/ and /usr/share/sgml/
are the FHS directories. Those links weren't saying anything about
/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/4.1/ (the Debian way) vs.
/usr/share/sgml/sgml-dtd-4.1/ (RedHat).
^^^
Daniel Reed wrote:
ITP: tetrix [2003-09-10]
Description: ESR's curses-based version of Tetris
Proposer: Andrew B. Clegg
ITP:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00115.html
Status: ITP posted. Attained required 3 votes.
HOLD-UPS: No package, nothing to review!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerritt,
Thanks for your comments. Responses inline:
Gerritt P. Haase wrote:
Binary package:
Postinstall out of date, use _update_info_dir package as requirement
in setup.hint.
I had this discussion before. The conclusion was that this doesn't
