Re: Status on coreutils?

2004-04-02 Thread Mark Blackburn
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 1 15:18, Mark Blackburn wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: [...] Ask Mark what's the problem. He was already as far as removing su, kill and uptime from the binary package but then... Corinna I was trying to get make check to finish completely but it looks like it

ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread A. Alper ATICI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leafnode is an NNTP proxy suitable for small sites: http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/ Issues: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News spool has to be on NTFS, and it seems this will be

Re: Status on coreutils?

2004-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 2 08:02, Mark Blackburn wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Huh? What should be the reason for this? The recursive commands from fileutils are runnning fine under 1.5.9. And I have a local build of coreutils which also doesn't have problems under 1.5.9. fileutils is irrelevent

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 2 16:45, A. Alper ATICI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leafnode is an NNTP proxy suitable for small sites: http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/ Issues: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News

Re: RFC: add a dummy configure to the packaging templates

2004-04-02 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Igor == Igor Pechtchanski writes: Igor Umm, what would be great? Adding the script, or having it use lndir under Igor the covers? The second. Ciao Volker

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread A. Alper ATICI
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News spool has to be on NTFS, and it seems this will be an NT/2K/XP only package. Is that necessary? Can't that be

Re: Status on coreutils?

2004-04-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 2 08:02, Mark Blackburn wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Huh? What should be the reason for this? The recursive commands from fileutils are runnning fine under 1.5.9. And I have a local build of coreutils which also

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:22:53PM +0300, A. Alper ATICI wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News spool has to be on NTFS, and it seems this will be an

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Nicholas Wourms
alper wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News spool has to be on NTFS, and it seems this will be an NT/2K/XP only package. Is that necessary? Can't that be

Re: Status on coreutils?

2004-04-02 Thread Mark Blackburn
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 2 08:02, Mark Blackburn wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Huh? What should be the reason for this? The recursive commands from fileutils are runnning fine under 1.5.9. And I have a local build of

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:22:53PM +0300, A. Alper ATICI wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current implementation of hlinks on FAT32 breaks it. News spool has

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:16:53PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:22:53PM +0300, A. Alper ATICI wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 1. Leafnode relies on hard-link counts, so current

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:16:53PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:22:53PM +0300, A. Alper ATICI wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

Re: [ITP] XmHTML: A widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text

2004-04-02 Thread Harold L Hunt II
I vote pro for XmHTML. I believe that means that it now has the required 3 votes and a good to go review. Harold

Re: ITP: leafnode

2004-04-02 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I vote no on this package given the above restriction. Umm, why? Not that I'm voting for it, but as long as the package detects that it's not running on NTFS and bails out gracefully, it should be fine. We have other NT-only packages

Re: [setup] ini in same dir as package - 'base' is one off. (+ patch)

2004-04-02 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:35:37 +0100 (MET) schreef ik in [EMAIL PROTECTED] [patch] Ehh.., ping! 2004-03-06 Bas A. van Gompel cygwin-apps.buzz at bavag.tmfweb.nl * package_source.cc: (packagesource::set_canonical) Fix one-off in 'base' when ini is in same dir as package. Buzz