Re: GNOME category exists now?

2004-10-28 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: This is the list of sections that I found in ftp://ftp.gnu.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz : admin electroni interpret misc perl tex base embedded kde net pythontext comm games libdevel news science

Re: GNOME category exists now?

2004-10-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor writes: We don't do things exactly like Debian in every case but if there is precedent in Debian it helps to make the Cygwin decision. Except maybe in this specific case, if you know that Debian sections are considered foo

Re: update: guile-1.6.5 and 1.7.1.CVS

2004-10-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Gerrit P. Haase writes: Sorry, missed this one. Thanks. I didn't think of that. If any problems, please remove 1.6.4-12, it is buggy and 1.6.5 should be better on all accounts. And keep 1.6.4-2? 1.6.4-2 is for the cygwin1.3 abi, I think it's safe to remove that now. Please just keep

Re: Missing DocBook XML DTD

2004-10-28 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Jani Tiainen wrote: Actually in my installation I have no /usr/share/xml/docbook-4.1.2, instead I have usr/share docbook-xml42, and under /usr/share/xml is _only_ libglade subdir... Wondered that while looking those one of scripts... Are packages installed improperly in wrong directory? Hmmm,

Bash updates, bashdb, bash_completion, etc.

2004-10-28 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Hello all, Let me just start by saying that I really think bashdb would be a nice addition to Cygwin. That said, I'll need some convincing to add it to mainline Bash as I don't want to maintain YA out-of-tree patch for Bash if I can help it. As for Bash-2.05b-17: I've applied Pierre's patch to

Please add me to cvsadmin group on sources

2004-10-28 Thread Max Bowsher
I want to be able to fix up keyword expansion modes, and toggle states of revisions (for move-simulation). There is nothing that can be done with cvsadmin that cannot be done by editing the RCS files directly - cvs admin is just a bit more convenient and safer. Max.

setup.exe - RFC: reorganizing source into category directories

2004-10-28 Thread Max Bowsher
Setup.exe has a *lot* of source files. To make the source a little more comprehendable, I'm planning on moving certain subsystems which effectively are utility libraries in their own right into subdirectories. This should hopefully be a step on the path to untangling the logic and the GUI

Re: setup.exe - RFC: reorganizing source into category directories

2004-10-28 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: Setup.exe has a *lot* of source files. To make the source a little more comprehendable, I'm planning on moving certain subsystems which effectively are utility libraries in their own right into subdirectories. This should hopefully be a step on the

Re: setup.exe - RFC: reorganizing source into category directories

2004-10-28 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: Setup.exe has a *lot* of source files. To make the source a little more comprehendable, I'm planning on moving certain subsystems which effectively are utility libraries in their own right into subdirectories. This should hopefully

RE: setup.exe - RFC: reorganizing source into category directories

2004-10-28 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Setup.exe has a *lot* of source files. To make the source a little more comprehendable, I'm planning on moving certain subsystems which effectively are utility libraries in their own right into subdirectories. This should hopefully be a step on the path to untangling the logic and the