http://tu.xarch.at/publ/cygwin/release/mathomatic/setup.hint (changed)
http://tu.xarch.at/publ/cygwin/release/mathomatic/mathomatic-12.4.3-1.tar.bz2
97512 123a75effd23d4d459a237fa78d5fee3
http://tu.xarch.at/publ/cygwin/release/mathomatic/mathomatic-12.4.3-1-src.tar.bz2
147793 909d75570f0e0ba07
Op Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:17:13 -0500 schreef Gary R. Van Sickle
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: > -Original Message-
[...] On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
: > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 3:06 PM
: > It seems there may be a need for a Debian-like
: > update-alternatives system on cygwin (see the rec
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 20 12:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux distros
on whether the package should be called "apache2" or "httpd".
I have chosen to follow the naming of th
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > > > There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux
> > > > distros on whether the package should be called "apache2"
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > > There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux
> > > distros on whether the package should be called "apache2" or
> > > "httpd".
> > > I have chosen to follow the naming
On Jun 20 12:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >>There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux distros on
> >>whether the package should be called "apache2" or "httpd".
> >>I have chosen to follow the naming of the official t
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux distros on
whether the package should be called "apache2" or "httpd".
I have chosen to follow the naming of the official tarball, and call it
"httpd". (Red Hat/Fedora does
On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux distros on
> whether the package should be called "apache2" or "httpd".
> I have chosen to follow the naming of the official tarball, and call it
> "httpd". (Red Hat/Fedora does the same, FWIW)
