Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Hence the suggestion of using the features provided by the
alternatives package. Am I correct in assuming this works even for
dynamically loaded dlls?
No. It works for .so's on Linux, because the Linux loader understands
symlinks. Cygwin piggybacks on the W
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:40:28PM -0600, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > At the risk of incurring Corinna's wrath, I second the request. I'd like
> > to see someone submit an X-less perl-Tk package too, with support in both
> > for alternatives.
>
> Here are t
Charles Wilson wrote:
I'd like to make a request: gbs is getting out of control with this
feature and that feature added. Some of these tasks are NEVER going to
be performed by anyone other than the primary maintainer: has anyone
actually used 'foo.sh list' or 'foo.sh depends'?
I use these t
Yaakov S said:
Note that Perl/Tk is a Tk *implementation*, and does not depend on tcltk.
..
ldesc: "Complete Perl interface for Tk, built against Cygwin/X."
Well that ldesc is confusing considering that.
I think some of the confusion stems from the fact that tk is too closely
associtated wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Franke wrote:
> What would you think about an autoconf-like approach generating a
> "package-VER.sh" script from some "package.sh.in" (yes, no version).
>
> Then fixes and new features will be added to only one generation tool
> (autogbs ?-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This thread seems to have gone to sleep.
Summary: The addition of the 'logging' g-b-s feature introduced a bug:
Errors during phases of package building do not halt the build, so that
an error during 'make' or 'make install' would not prevent the 'pkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>>Max Bowsher writes:
>
> > Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >> Max, would it be possible to recompile neon so that it picks up the
> new
> >> openssl package ?
>
> > Refreshing neon is of course, not a problem.
>
> Max Bowsher writes:
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> I would like to contribute and maintain the cadaver package:
>>
>> * http://www.webdav.org/cadaver/ (Homepage)
>>
>> Max, would it be possible to recompile neon so that it picks up the new
>> openssl package ?
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
[...]
P.S. It'd be a different story if we were using an 'engine' with
external overrides, like mingwports or cgf's netrel(?) -- then mods to
the engine to provide new features would be distinct from the
package-specific overrides. But gbs ain't like that.
Wh
