From: Dave Korn
I'm wondering if Dave Korn or Brian Dessent would consider
maintaining gcc?
Well I didn't finish rolling the lot over the weekend owing
to reasons I'll
explain on the talk list, but I'm saying yes anyway. First
thing I'll do will
be reroll a 3.4.4-2 with the fix
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:54:33PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard
drive, so there's no upstream site, and obviously there are no Linux
distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in favor...
+1
Cheers,
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin.applications
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 8:54 PM
Subject: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1
checkX is a little utility I wrote that tests to see if (a) the X11
client DLLs are installed on the machine, and (b) the Xserver on
I'm packaging a new release of lftp. The default config file
(/etc/lftp.conf) is slightly different from the one in the previous release.
This raises a problem: how should I determine whether to replace the old
config file? There are at least three approaches, in increasing order of
complexity:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Schulman wrote:
I'm packaging a new release of lftp. The default config file
(/etc/lftp.conf) is slightly different from the one in the previous release.
This raises a problem: how should I determine whether to replace the old
config
On 5/9/06, Max Bowsher wrote:
(3) Compute a checksum of the current /etc/lftp.conf, and compare it to the
checksum of the old default. If they're the same, then the user hasn't
touched the old default so copy the new default in. If they're different,
then prompt the user as in (2). So we
I just got an error:
upset: *** warning package rxvt-unicode-common refers to non-existent
external-source: unicode-rxvt-X
So, I changed unicode-rxvt-X - rxvt-unicode-X in the
rxvt-unicode-common setup.hint.
cgf
