Re: [ITP, take 2] Re: [ITP] libelf

2009-12-24 Thread Dave Korn
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 23/12/2009 21:52, Dave Korn wrote: When I build those packages from source, there is no dependency on libgcc: Did you actually get such a dependency when you built it, or was this just a thinko? Yes, when I rebuilt your package from source, there is a

[OT] Re: moratorium on new package submissions!

2009-12-24 Thread Dave Korn
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 23/12/2009 21:42, Dave Korn wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 01:58:48AM +, Dave Korn wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 23/12/2009 14:53, Christopher Faylor wrote: Of course, there has been at least one package update since I sent this

Re: moratorium on new package submissions!

2009-12-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:53:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:34:20PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: Can we hold off on new package uploads for a couple of days to allow the mirrors some time to stabilize? I was thinking that we could

[ITP] Qt4

2009-12-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
The Qt3 packages are currently mine, but most Qt/KDE packages have moved on to the Qt4 series already. While I've had this in Ports for a while, the extra dependencies of some of the components have held those releases back from inclusion in the distro. Instead of delaying this any further,

Re: [ITP] libelf

2009-12-24 Thread David Billinghurst
On 12/21/09, Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com wrote: (BTW, David B., if you're listening: cloog-ppl could do with a bump; the version is up to 0.15.7 in ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ and gcc HEAD checks in the configure script for = 0.15.5 and disables graphite if it