Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com writes:
I've uploaded the setup.hint and the obvious two tar files. The
git-oodiff-20080328.tar.bz2 doesn't seem like it is needed right?
Correct.
Thanks,
Jari
Hi,
libusb 1.0 is a revamp of the previous legacy libusb, with an
incompatible interface. The legacy libusb used to have an external
windows port, libusb-win32. libusb 1.0 has integrated windows support
in a development branch which will eventually be merged. A notable
difference with
I have uploaded an initial packaging on
http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb/setup.hint
http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb/libusb-1.0.5+git03e9371a-1-src.tar.bz2
http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb/libusb-1.0.5+git03e9371a-1.tar.bz2
http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb/libusb-devel/setup.hint
On 14/02/2010 17:51, Samuel Thibault wrote:
libusb 1.0 is a revamp of the previous legacy libusb, with an
incompatible interface.
In essence, this is a separate library from the old libusb, and upstream
smartly made this parallel installable to the old API. For this reason,
IMO the 1.0
Yaakov (Cygwin/X), le Sun 14 Feb 2010 20:37:20 -0600, a écrit :
On 14/02/2010 17:51, Samuel Thibault wrote:
libusb 1.0 is a revamp of the previous legacy libusb, with an
incompatible interface.
In essence, this is a separate library from the old libusb, and upstream
smartly made this
Cyrille Lefevre a écrit :
let's try -apps ?
I use ksh as /bin/sh bcoz pdksh is far more performant than bash
(the same heavy script takes around 2.5 mins using ksh and around 6 mins
using bash !)
$ ls -l /usr/bin/sh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2010-02-08 17:11 /usr/bin/sh - ksh.exe
But :
Cyrille Lefevre a écrit :
let's try -apps ?
FYI
package version : pdksh-5.2.14-3.tar.bz2
postinstall message :
running: D:\Cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
/etc/postinstall/pdksh.sh
/etc/postinstall/pdksh.sh: line 6: @(#)PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2: No
such file or directory
