Re: gcc4: Time to drop gcc3 from the distro?

2011-09-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 2 22:15, Dave Korn wrote: On 02/09/2011 19:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: As the subject says, shouldn't we remove gcc3 from the distro finally? We have 3 mingw compilers and gcc4 for Cygwin. What reason is left to stick to gcc 3? Well, it's the only support we have for Pascal

Re: RFU: libsigc2.0-2.2.10-1

2011-09-03 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 03/09/2011 1:05 AM, Andy Koppe wrote: The existing directory for the package is called 'libsigc2.0' rather than 'libsigc', so I put the files in there. Hope that's as intended. That's correct. Going forward I will rename my local libsigc to libsigc2.0 to make the upload easier. Thank

Re: gcc4: Time to drop gcc3 from the distro?

2011-09-03 Thread Dave Korn
On 03/09/2011 09:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Sep 2 22:15, Dave Korn wrote: On 02/09/2011 19:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: As the subject says, shouldn't we remove gcc3 from the distro finally? We have 3 mingw compilers and gcc4 for Cygwin. What reason is left to stick to gcc 3? Well,

[RFU] task-1.9.4-2

2011-09-03 Thread Federico Hernandez
A new cygwin package version of task is available (due core dumps of the current version with newer cygwin versions). It is a required update. The old version should be removed from the repositories. Please upload. --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \  

Building setup.exe: conflicting declarations of ssize_t

2011-09-03 Thread Ken Brown
Building setup.exe fails as follows: depbase=`echo archive.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`;\ i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\setup\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\setup\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\0\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\setup\ 0\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\xxx\ -DPACKAGE_URL=\\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=1