Re: [RFU] TeX Live 2012 (texlive-20120628-1, etc.)

2012-07-17 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/16/2012 6:36 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-16 12:07, Ken Brown wrote: Sorry, I messed up some setup.hint files. Please upload the corrected ones: Done. And another one: cd TeX/texlive sed -i -e 's/libpoppler19/libpoppler26/' setup.hint Thanks, and sorry for all the

Re: [RFC] cygport: split debuginfo packages

2012-07-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: Attached is a first draft of a patch to support split debuginfo packages automatically in cygport. I'm looking for comments and suggestions, particularly on the following: The automatic generation of the packages works great, thank you. Looking at the resulting

Re: [RFU] TeX Live 2012 (texlive-20120628-1, etc.)

2012-07-17 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/17/2012 12:18 PM, Ken Brown wrote: And another one: cd TeX/texlive sed -i -e 's/libpoppler19/libpoppler26/' setup.hint Done. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [RFC] cygport: split debuginfo packages

2012-07-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:36:48PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: Attached is a first draft of a patch to support split debuginfo packages automatically in cygport. I'm looking for comments and suggestions, particularly on the following: The automatic generation of the

Re: [RFC] cygport: split debuginfo packages

2012-07-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Christopher Faylor writes: Maybe the .debuginfo files should be in a Debug category. I don't think that would be the right thing to do. It would only be of help if the debuginfo packages were not shown in the other categories together with the installation packages, but a flat Debug category

Re: [RFC] cygport: split debuginfo packages

2012-07-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: Christopher Faylor writes: Maybe the .debuginfo files should be in a Debug category. I don't think that would be the right thing to do. It would only be of help if the debuginfo packages were not shown in the other categories together

Re: [RFC] cygport: split debuginfo packages

2012-07-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-17 13:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:36:48PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: So if there's a source package package-version-src.tar.bz2, then the debuginfo package would be called package-version-debuginfo.tar.bz2 and it would be selected from libpackage if that

[ITP] mosh with protobuf and perl-IO-Tty

2012-07-17 Thread Reini Urban
I want to maintain mosh on cygwin. See http://mosh.mit.edu/ The necessary deps are protobuf and perl-IO-Tty. All three exist on most major distros, e.g. debian. mosh-1.2.2-1 protobuf-2.4.1-1 perl-IO-Tty-1.10-1 hints and packages here: http://perl514.cpanel.net/cygwin/ -- Reini Urban

Re: [ITP] mosh with protobuf and perl-IO-Tty

2012-07-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-17 18:00, Reini Urban wrote: mosh-1.2.2-1 protobuf-2.4.1-1 perl-IO-Tty-1.10-1 hints and packages here: http://perl514.cpanel.net/cygwin/ I'm getting connection timeout errors. Yaakov

[ITA] dejagnu

2012-07-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
It slipped by me at the time[1], but cgf asked if I could update dejagnu, so here it is: ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/release-2/dejagnu/ Yaakov [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00649.html