Ken Brown writes:
> I'm not crazy about the idea of using texmf-dist for files that are
> not part of the upstream distribution. Maybe /etc/texmf
> (a.k.a. TEXMFSYSCONFIG) would be a better place.
Certainly, that seems to be a better place. I just didn't want to
create subdirectories in /etc/pos
On 8/3/2012 3:20 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Hi Ken,
Ken Brown writes:
1. When creating the various texlive-collection-* packages, instead of
creating postinstall scripts, I would drop files into
/usr/share/texmf-dist/postinstall containing the postinstall
information.
Exactly, although you could
Hi Reini,
I hope you don't mind that I move this discussion here, but it seems to
be the more appropriate place.
[Summary of previous discussion] I think that each perl module
distribution should have its own Cygwin package. Since our perl
installation at work needs quite a few more distributio
