On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:44:37 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
Sounds good.
It's done now.
How should we handle the announcement(s)? Should each
maintainer send their own announcement(s)? Or, should one coordinated
announcement be sent?
Go ahead and announce 2.7.3, and mention prominently that
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Jari Aalto: bzr, codeville, getmail, mercurial, offlineimap, planet,
pylint, python-crypto, python-feedparser, python-logilab-astng,
python-logilab-common, python-paramiko, spambayes, stgit, tailor,
urlgrabber
Marco Atzeri:
On Feb 8 03:21, Yaakov wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Jari Aalto: bzr, codeville, getmail, mercurial, offlineimap, planet,
pylint, python-crypto, python-feedparser, python-logilab-astng,
python-logilab-common, python-paramiko, spambayes, stgit, tailor,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:49:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 8 03:21, Yaakov wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Jari Aalto: bzr, codeville, getmail, mercurial, offlineimap, planet,
pylint, python-crypto, python-feedparser, python-logilab-astng,
On 25/01/2013 22:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] README: document some recent changes in the build
environment
I've applied the uncontroversial part of this patch.
In future, please use the ChangeLog format linked to in [1]. (emacs protip:
C-x 4 a :-))
[1]
Jon TURNEY writes:
I've applied the uncontroversial part of this patch.
Thank you.
In future, please use the ChangeLog format linked to in [1]. (emacs protip:
C-x 4 a :-))
Noted.
I had a go at rewriting this, but The libgetopt++ CVS module should be
automatically checked out in a
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500
Subject: nuke cygwin legacy?
Greetings, All,
Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5
support so I'm wondering if anyone has any objections to removing
1.5 from cygwin.com.
I was
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:48:12PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500
Subject: nuke cygwin legacy?
Greetings, All,
Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5
support so I'm wondering if
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 12:00:46AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:48:12PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500
Subject: nuke cygwin legacy?
Greetings, All,
Corinna +1'ed my suggestion
