Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) mpfr

2013-04-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Sorry, I made another mistake. Can the version in the setup.hint file for mpfr-debuginfo please be corrected to 3.1.2-1 (the release number is wrongly -2 at the moment)? Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:

Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) mpfr

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 09:33, Achim Gratz wrote: Sorry, I made another mistake. Can the version in the setup.hint file for mpfr-debuginfo please be corrected to 3.1.2-1 (the release number is wrongly -2 at the moment)? No worries. Fixed on cygwin.com. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 19 22:27, Ken Brown wrote: On 4/19/2013 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: texlive texlive-collection-bibtexextra texlive-collection-binextra texlive-collection-latexextra texlive-collection-mathextra The 64-bit distro is still missing a few build dependencies for

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Erwin Waterlander
Op 19-4-2013 12:45, Corinna Vinschen schreef: Hi maintainers, the 64 bit Cygwin seems to be quite stable now. We're still suffering from a gcc problem which seems to affect C++ inline methods using templates, so some C++ packages might not be buildable yet(*), but other than that it looks

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Erwin Waterlander
Op 19-4-2013 12:45, Corinna Vinschen schreef: Hi maintainers, the 64 bit Cygwin seems to be quite stable now. We're still suffering from a gcc problem which seems to affect C++ inline methods using templates, so some C++ packages might not be buildable yet(*), but other than that it looks

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread marco atzeri
On 4/19/2013 12:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi maintainers, Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you could try to build it. Here's the list of missing deps as of today: for ImageMagick

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 10:27, Erwin Waterlander wrote: Hi, I need gperf for building libunistring. I just uploaded a gperf package to the 64 bit release area. HTH, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Bob Heckel
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: ... Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you could try to build it. Here's the list of missing deps as of today: ... w3m ... Hi, I'm

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Bob, On Apr 20 11:24, Bob Heckel wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: ... Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you could try to build it. Here's the list of missing

cloog-ppl vs. cloog-isl

2013-04-20 Thread Achim Gratz
I've realized that both packages try to install /usr/share/info/cloog.info. Simply renaming the file doesn't work since the directory entry will be wrong. I could drop libcloog-ppl-doc and only provide this via libcloog-isl-doc or I'd have to patch the texinfo sources to change the directory

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 18:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 20 11:24, Bob Heckel wrote: I'm having trouble packaging 64-bit gc-7.2d libgc (upon which w3m depends). There are extensive 32-bit Cygwin adaptations to the upstream libgc code. After much trial and error it seems I lack the experience in

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Marco, On Apr 20 10:43, marco atzeri wrote: On 4/19/2013 12:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi maintainers, Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you could try to build it. Here's the list of

cygport rpm-style

2013-04-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Hi Yaakov, as you know I have been using a modified version of cygport to make more extensive use of version-less cygport files and patches and to more generally allow the omission of the .cygport suffix on the command line. For want of a better word I've called these changes rpm-style. To avoid

No cc command.

2013-04-20 Thread Erwin Waterlander
Op 20-4-2013 10:21, Erwin Waterlander schreef: Hi, Today I installed cygwin64 and had no problems. I only noticed that after I installed gcc-g++ 4.8.0 there was no 'cc' command available. I have in a Makefile: CC ?= gcc And this leads to an error: make: cc: Command not found. So when

libqhull-devel

2013-04-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Hi Marco, the includes are in /usr/include/libqhull on Cygwin, but all software using it I've found so far expects to find them in /usr/include/qhull instead. I've simply dropped a link on my system, but could you explain why you've chosen libqhull? Regards Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12

Re: No cc command.

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 20:41, Erwin Waterlander wrote: Op 20-4-2013 10:21, Erwin Waterlander schreef: Hi, Today I installed cygwin64 and had no problems. I only noticed that after I installed gcc-g++ 4.8.0 there was no 'cc' command available. I have in a Makefile: CC ?= gcc And this leads

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 20:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: And ask upstream if it's really necessary... # ifdef CYGWIN32 # define OS_TYPE CYGWIN32 This entire ifdef CYGWIN32 block is in another block handling I386. It needs to be copied verbatim to the X86_64 block. This header file is a big

Re: cloog-ppl vs. cloog-isl

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 19:39, Achim Gratz wrote: I've realized that both packages try to install /usr/share/info/cloog.info. Simply renaming the file doesn't work since the directory entry will be wrong. I could drop libcloog-ppl-doc and only provide this via libcloog-isl-doc or I'd have to patch the

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Bob Heckel
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: This entire ifdef CYGWIN32 block is in another block handling I386. It needs to be copied verbatim to the X86_64 block. This header file is a big mess! I couldn't agree more :) I thought I had it figured out a few times, adding CYGWIN64

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 15:29, Bob Heckel wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: This entire ifdef CYGWIN32 block is in another block handling I386. It needs to be copied verbatim to the X86_64 block. This header file is a big mess! I couldn't agree more :) I thought I had it

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread marco atzeri
On 4/20/2013 8:29 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Marco, On Apr 20 10:43, marco atzeri wrote: On 4/19/2013 12:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi maintainers, Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 20 22:29, marco atzeri wrote: On 4/20/2013 8:29 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Marco, On Apr 20 10:43, marco atzeri wrote: On 4/19/2013 12:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi maintainers, Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the

Re: libqhull-devel

2013-04-20 Thread Achim Gratz
marco atzeri writes: upstream decision not mine on latest versions; for that reason on octave the qhull check is like this: OCTAVE_CHECK_LIB(qhull, QHull, [Qhull library not found -- this will result in loss of functionality of some geometry functions.], [libqhull/libqhull.h

Re: cloog-ppl vs. cloog-isl

2013-04-20 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-04-20 12:39, Achim Gratz wrote: I've realized that both packages try to install /usr/share/info/cloog.info. Simply renaming the file doesn't work since the directory entry will be wrong. I could drop libcloog-ppl-doc and only provide this via libcloog-isl-doc or I'd have to patch the

Re: No cc command.

2013-04-20 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-04-20 13:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Yes, known problem. cc is only missing for the time being. So far it was created by alternatives (to support gcc-3 vs. gcc-4 on 32 bit), but in future I guess we should simply create cc as symlink to gcc right in the gcc-core package. Just create

Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

2013-04-20 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-04-20 03:43, marco atzeri wrote: for ImageMagick still missing: libautotrace3 libfpx1 libgs9 libpango1.0_0 librsvg2_2 librsvg deps pango which deps harfbuzz, so we need to fix the C++ template issue first. Yaakov

Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?

2013-04-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 17/04/2013 19:59, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-04-11 07:32, Dave Korn wrote: On 11/04/2013 07:58, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Your boehm-gc patch can replace my java-libgc-win32.patch, provided it works properly. It appears to, libjava testsuite results are as good as they've ever