Re: perl-5.18.2-1

2014-10-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 28 12:41, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/16/2014 3:04 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov Selkowitz writes: Thanks for the reminder. Where did we leave off wrt breaking out perl_vendor? I've offered a practical way to do this for everyone to test on a 32bit install. If that works and is

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Andrew Schulman
Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over 1.3Gib. Do maintainers have any objections to

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/29/2014 07:42 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Christian Franke
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over 1.3Gib. Do maintainers

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 10/29/2014 2:42 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread JonY
On 10/29/2014 21:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread David Stacey
On 29/10/14 13:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over 1.3Gib.

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Ken Brown
On 10/29/2014 9:42 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup. These files consume a total of over

Re: HEADSUP Maintainers: Stale packages on sourceware

2014-10-29 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-10-29 16:59, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 10/29/2014 2:42 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Please find attached a list of old package tarballs which are not listed anywhere in setup.ini, meaning that they are not listed as a previous, current, or test package, and cannot be installed with setup.