Ruby library infected ???

2014-11-10 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! Today i have updated 64-bit Cygwin and my antivirus gave me an alert: --- cut --- FilenameRiskAction Risk Type Original LocationComputerUser Status rational.so Trojan.ADH Pending AnalysisFile;

SSH key for upload access

2014-11-10 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Name: Dr. Volker Zell Package: tzcode BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Comment: 2048-bit RSA, converted by vzell@leila from OpenSSH B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDIvwAJ4xrZ72Com6eAhaCgUVd+lQqWtWCi1TNN8q Wdzpj1L3CjDtZBCXto73SM6N73KjWkT+7Abo76DDGu67HtXVx670QmlaGCEz4Gjr5nhG/9

Re: SSH key for upload access

2014-11-10 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-10 08:09, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Name: Dr. Volker Zell Package: tzcode BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Comment: 2048-bit RSA, converted by vzell@leila from OpenSSH B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDIvwAJ4xrZ72Com6eAhaCgUVd+lQqWtWCi1TNN8q

Re: Ruby library infected ???

2014-11-10 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-10 07:04, Pavel Fedin wrote: Today i have updated 64-bit Cygwin and my antivirus gave me an alert: --- cut --- FilenameRiskAction Risk Type Original LocationComputerUser Status rational.so Trojan.ADH

Re: Ruby library infected ???

2014-11-10 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Yaakov. Monday, November 10, 2014, 20:42:20 you wrote: https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.setup.virus Oops, i am really sorry for hitting the FAQ and doing things absolutely opposite to what's suggested. :( Real programmers never have time to read docs... -- Kind regards,

cygwin beta packages

2014-11-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Two minor nits: The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during install in setup.exe. A better naming scheme would use a letter there, so perhaps 0b8 (I know that this doesn't produce problems since

Re: cygwin beta packages

2014-11-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: Apparently setup.exe doesn't parse the data for the cygwin package correctly, and its dependencies therefore don't get taken into account in computing the dependency order. To decide that, a formal definition of what is a permissible release number is required and I don't

Re: cygwin beta packages

2014-11-10 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/10/2014 1:31 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Two minor nits: The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during install in setup.exe. A better naming scheme would use a letter there, so perhaps 0b8 (I

Re: perl-5.18.2-1

2014-11-10 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/4/2014 11:25 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: I think Reini is talking about the changes introduced by Yaakov and subsequently followed by others (including me). But as long as you're getting the credit anyway, are you willing to adopt perl? We seem to be at an impasse

Re: cygwin beta packages

2014-11-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 10 22:24, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: Apparently setup.exe doesn't parse the data for the cygwin package correctly, and its dependencies therefore don't get taken into account in computing the dependency order. To decide that, a formal definition of what is a permissible

Re: cygwin beta packages

2014-11-10 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-10 12:31, Achim Gratz wrote: The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during install in setup.exe. Which places exactly? We could just fix this in setup instead. -- Yaakov