Hello!
Today i have updated 64-bit Cygwin and my antivirus gave me an alert:
--- cut ---
FilenameRiskAction Risk Type Original
LocationComputerUser
Status
rational.so Trojan.ADH Pending AnalysisFile;
Name: Dr. Volker Zell
Package: tzcode
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: 2048-bit RSA, converted by vzell@leila from OpenSSH
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDIvwAJ4xrZ72Com6eAhaCgUVd+lQqWtWCi1TNN8q
Wdzpj1L3CjDtZBCXto73SM6N73KjWkT+7Abo76DDGu67HtXVx670QmlaGCEz4Gjr5nhG/9
On 2014-11-10 08:09, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Name: Dr. Volker Zell
Package: tzcode
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: 2048-bit RSA, converted by vzell@leila from OpenSSH
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDIvwAJ4xrZ72Com6eAhaCgUVd+lQqWtWCi1TNN8q
On 2014-11-10 07:04, Pavel Fedin wrote:
Today i have updated 64-bit Cygwin and my antivirus gave me an alert:
--- cut ---
FilenameRiskAction Risk Type Original
LocationComputerUser
Status
rational.so Trojan.ADH
Hello, Yaakov.
Monday, November 10, 2014, 20:42:20 you wrote:
https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.setup.virus
Oops, i am really sorry for hitting the FAQ and doing things
absolutely opposite to what's suggested. :(
Real programmers never have time to read docs...
--
Kind regards,
Two minor nits:
The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is
chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during
install in setup.exe. A better naming scheme would use a letter there,
so perhaps 0b8 (I know that this doesn't produce problems since
Ken Brown writes:
Apparently setup.exe doesn't parse the data for the cygwin package
correctly, and its dependencies therefore don't get taken into account
in computing the dependency order.
To decide that, a formal definition of what is a permissible release
number is required and I don't
On 11/10/2014 1:31 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Two minor nits:
The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is
chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during
install in setup.exe. A better naming scheme would use a letter there,
so perhaps 0b8 (I
On 11/4/2014 11:25 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
I think Reini is talking about the changes introduced by Yaakov and
subsequently followed by others (including me). But as long as you're
getting the credit anyway, are you willing to adopt perl? We seem to
be at an impasse
On Nov 10 22:24, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
Apparently setup.exe doesn't parse the data for the cygwin package
correctly, and its dependencies therefore don't get taken into account
in computing the dependency order.
To decide that, a formal definition of what is a permissible
On 2014-11-10 12:31, Achim Gratz wrote:
The current beta packages contain a . in the release number. That dot is
chopped off along with the anything that follows in some places during
install in setup.exe.
Which places exactly? We could just fix this in setup instead.
--
Yaakov
11 matches
Mail list logo