Re: upset errors: lzo2 package - can't seem to upload anything

2014-11-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-15 10:16, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Can't we just rename the current liblzo2 directory to lzo2 ? I want the packages to be symmetric between x86/x86_64. They already are: ftp://ftp.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86/release/liblzo2/ ftp://ftp.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/liblzo2/ OTOH

postgresql: use system tzcode

2014-11-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
Marco, Currently, postgresql ships with a bundled (and old) version of tzdata. Instead, could you configure postgresql with --with-system-tzdata=/usr/share/zoneinfo and add tzcode to postgresql_REQUIRES? -- Yaakov

SSH key for upload access

2014-11-16 Thread D. Boland
Name: Daniel Boland Package: procmail BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Comment: 2048-bit RSA, converted by daniel@dimension from OpenSSH B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDVlIM8TfGSHpmiAwsSEhICBk7CWSTHkH+3hQDO25 jpVcbcsL3+ETIjXENz8Ik3gxZbO9l5AFMZWKx3wjK1ev5SbIQ3u7vRZOjWMLmTBOgMTh19

Re: upset errors: lzo2 package - can't seem to upload anything

2014-11-16 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Yaakov Selkowitz writes: On 2014-11-15 10:16, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Can't we just rename the current liblzo2 directory to lzo2 ? I want the packages to be symmetric between x86/x86_64. They already are: ftp://ftp.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86/release/liblzo2/

[RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-16 Thread Achim Gratz
As discussed on the main list, here's the incremental autorebase package as well as the patched setup.exe to implement perpetual postinstall scripts. $cygwin=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/ wget $cygwin/noarch/release/_incautorebase/_incautorebase-6-1.tar.bz2 wget $cygwin/x86/setup-x86.exe wget

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-16 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/16/2014 8:45 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: As discussed on the main list, here's the incremental autorebase package as well as the patched setup.exe to implement perpetual postinstall scripts. $cygwin=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/ wget

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: Would it be very hard to allow perpetual postinstall scripts to run either before or after all others? Not any harder than what is already there. ALthough if we are going to create even more strata of postinstall phases I'd opt for some refactoring. I could make very good

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-16 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/16/2014 11:20 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: Would it be very hard to allow perpetual postinstall scripts to run either before or after all others? Not any harder than what is already there. ALthough if we are going to create even more strata of postinstall phases I'd opt for

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: It might not be the best solution long term, but I could achieve substantial improvement without a great deal of effort. See http://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2014q4/003072.html for an indication of what I'd like to do. The author of that message isn't aware of the