Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> BTW I didn't notice any mention of rebuilding subversion and weechat.
I simply looked for packages named perl-* when asking for the rebuilds.
If the Perl part is nestled more deeply within other packages I wouldn't
know.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> With `git gui' you can easily split a patch in multiple parts by using
> the ability to commit single patch hunks.
I can do this just fine with Emacs and magit. Again, the problem really
is that the resulting individual commits would either not compile or not
work corre
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 07:22 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Library and tool for Portable Hardware Locality
> already in most Linux and BSD distri.
>
> Packages
> hwloc
> hwloc-devel
> libhwloc5
I would prefer calling the devel package libhwloc-devel.
--
Yaakov
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 18:09 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 18:59 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > I would appreciate if you could indicate whether the builds are
> > finished.
My packages are ready now.
BTW I didn't notice any mention of rebuilding subversion and weechat.
--
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 07:26 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
> If you've already installed RC2, then you'll have to re-install
> everything Perl (setup doesn't recognize 5.22.0-RC2 as being pre-5.22.0
> and all distributions that haven't had a version bump in the meantime
> still come with the same releas
On Jun 28 07:22, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Library and tool for Portable Hardware Locality
> already in most Linux and BSD distri.
>
> Packages
> hwloc
> hwloc-devel
> libhwloc5
Looks good, please upload.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 15:42 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 03:17 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> > Dr. Volker,
>> >
>> > A security vulnerability has been made public for libwmf:
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.re
busybox.exe with all working features enabled is ~600MB (bash:
~700MB). Removing the daemons, other rarely used commands and some
features could reduce it to 300-350MB. I did't test LTO build which
could further reduce size.
"KB", not "MB", sorry :-)
This is really cool, looking forward to see
On Jun 28 15:40, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> >> Otherwise it looks ok, but I'd be more comfortable to see the splitted
> >> patches before ok'ing it.
>
> It would be a lot of work to split it into separate commits that both
> compile and run OK, so I'm hoping the patch is acceptable
