Re: SSH key for upload access

2016-02-17 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 17 February 2016 at 15:33, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > I tried a cygport upload and I was prompted for a password, any idea why? Never mind, brain fart moment. All good now. Thanks again, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe

Re: SSH key for upload access

2016-02-17 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 17 February 2016 at 15:21, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-02-17 13:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> Name: Chris Sutcliffe >> Package: mksh > > Key installed. Welcome back! Thank you! I tried a cygport upload and I was prompted for a password, any idea why? Thanks, Chris -- Chris

Re: SSH key for upload access

2016-02-17 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-02-17 13:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Name: Chris Sutcliffe Package: mksh Key installed. Welcome back! -- Yaakov

SSH key for upload access

2016-02-17 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Name: Chris Sutcliffe Package: mksh BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY B3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAMfsLcp6u6LOeOlgJjDDpEIWW30rFmIUl5vxY3mVbvAr81bLFq t/4wzxB4kJubwGs09m9H9oKHN9aj51j+JxbRm4+VqEkSU2EFRJ1cEC6+uRalHBQsKQ7jLH hHr+HJ698flpCluXH0ixXzIqr4D5sji59VmR5/PuMyyiUaqU3l8vFQCQIwCmF5wlTc

Re: [ITA] mksh

2016-02-17 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-02-17 12:57, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 17 February 2016 at 12:05, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I would like to adopt mksh as it is orphaned. In terms of the ITP process, do I upload all the packages to a server for someone to preview before I upload? Your previous versions look fine, so

Re: [ITA] mksh

2016-02-17 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 17 February 2016 at 12:05, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > I would like to adopt mksh as it is orphaned. In terms of the ITP process, do I upload all the packages to a server for someone to preview before I upload? Looking at http://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html I see that cygport

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes: >> OK, although we might need some sort of escaping in the long run. > > Yes, I have no problem with later adding escaping e.g. using '\', if > needed, since that can written with a character by character lexer. Indeed and it should also be possible to parse via regex. IN any

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 17 14:23, Jon Turney wrote: > On 09/02/2016 17:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >IMHO we don't need "skip". A source-only package should be > >automatically skipped anyway. What other reason do we need to ignore > >a package? > > Yes, this is why I ask the question. > > I don't see what

Re: [ITP] Inetutils 1.9.4

2016-02-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Daniel, On Feb 16 17:28, D. Boland wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Feb 13 07:56, D. Boland wrote: > >>Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>On Feb 7 18:55, D. Boland wrote: > Some programs in the inetutils suite are packaged already: > [...] > So I added these on the 'required'

[ITA] mksh

2016-02-17 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hi All, I would like to adopt mksh as it is orphaned. Thank you, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Jon Turney
On 09/02/2016 17:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 9 13:18, Jon Turney wrote: * 'sdesc' text is mangled in setup.ini (but not the HTML package list) In particular, it is forced to start with a capital letter (which is incorrect when the sdesc starts with a command name which is properly