crypt mismatch

2016-02-18 Thread Marco Atzeri
on x86: $ cygcheck -f /usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll crypt-1.2-1 $ cygcheck -l crypt /usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll /usr/bin/crypt.exe /usr/lib/libcrypt.a /usr/lib/libcrypt.dll.a /usr/include/crypt.h /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/crypt.README on x64 crypt 1.1-1 libcrypt-devel

Re: packaging dependencies and testing

2016-02-18 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 18/02/2016 21:40, Subhasis Ray wrote: Hi, I am trying to build a package for moose (https://github.com/BhallaLab/moose-core). It builds and runs on latest cygwin using setup.py. I have two questions regarding packaging for cygwin: 2) Is there a way that I can check that my package works

Re: packaging dependencies and testing

2016-02-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-02-18 14:40, Subhasis Ray wrote: I am trying to build a package for moose (https://github.com/BhallaLab/moose-core). It builds and runs on latest cygwin using setup.py. I have two questions regarding packaging for cygwin: 1) moose depends on libsbml, which does not have any package for

packaging dependencies and testing

2016-02-18 Thread Subhasis Ray
Hi, I am trying to build a package for moose (https://github.com/BhallaLab/moose-core). It builds and runs on latest cygwin using setup.py. I have two questions regarding packaging for cygwin: 1) moose depends on libsbml, which does not have any package for cygwin but I built it on my local

Re: googlecl

2016-02-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-02-18 09:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 18 February 2016 at 10:37, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-02-18 09:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I haven't tested the existing googlecl package to see if it still works, but I suspect it doesn't given the statement above. Should it be removed from

Re: googlecl

2016-02-18 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 18 February 2016 at 10:37, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-02-18 09:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> I haven't tested the existing googlecl package to see if it still >> works, but I suspect it doesn't given the statement above. Should it >> be removed from the distro? > > > If it doesn't

Re: googlecl

2016-02-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-02-18 09:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I haven't tested the existing googlecl package to see if it still works, but I suspect it doesn't given the statement above. Should it be removed from the distro? If it doesn't work anymore, then it should be removed. -- Yaakov

googlecl

2016-02-18 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hi All, I was debating whether to revive the googlecl package so I dropped by the official project page (https://code.google.com/archive/p/googlecl/) and noticed this: 8 June 2015: GoogleCL is currently broken due to the OAuth1 turndown, and likely to remain so. Thanks for your support over the

Duplicity

2016-02-18 Thread J2897
Cygwin appears to be appending unnessesary permissions to the files I create/modify... John ~ $ DUMP=/cygdrive/c/Users/John/temp/dump John ~ $ icacls "$(cygpath -w "$DUMP")" /reset processed file: C:\Users\John\temp\dump John SH $ icacls "$(cygpath -w "$DUMP")" C:\Users\John\temp\dump NT