Haxe package

2017-05-15 Thread Andy Li
Hi, Here is the Haxe package I wanted to create and maintain. Haxe is a programming language that compiles to JS, Java, C#, C++, and many more. More info can be found at https://haxe.org/. The haxe.cygport file I created can be found at: https://github.com/andyli/haxe-cygwin Please review and

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > Yes, that works around the problem by not actually creating an empty > binary tarball. But I still think cygport should allow the creation > of an empty binary tarball by a set but empty PKG_CONTENTS. What we should really do is make setup handle obsoletions instead of this

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread szgyg
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:22:04PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > On 5/15/2017 12:51 PM, szgyg wrote: >> I've used the attached files to create an empty, dependencies-only package. > > Yes, that works around the problem by not actually creating an empty binary > tarball. But I still think cygport

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Ken Brown
On 5/15/2017 12:51 PM, szgyg wrote: On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:20:46PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/15/2017 11:56 AM, Jon Turney wrote: You can always make an empty tarball called texlive-collection-htmlxml-20170515.tar.xz or whatever, and use that for SRC_URI. Good idea, thanks

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread szgyg
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:20:46PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > On 5/15/2017 11:56 AM, Jon Turney wrote: >> You can always make an empty tarball called >> texlive-collection-htmlxml-20170515.tar.xz or whatever, and use that for >> SRC_URI. > > Good idea, thanks. Bu

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Jon Turney
On 15/05/2017 17:12, Brian Inglis wrote: [intended for cygwin-apps?] Doh! Yes.

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Ken Brown
u're right, I can do something like that. I was being overly pedantic in wanting SRC_URI to be "accurate". Sorry for the noise. You can always make an empty tarball called texlive-collection-htmlxml-20170515.tar.xz or whatever, and use that for SRC_URI. Good idea, thanks. But it turns ou

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Inglis
r do you see another way around this? >>> >>> I would think you can use the same SRC_URI as previously, but set >>> PKG_CONTENTS="" and PKG_IGNORE="*" ? >> >> You're right, I can do something like that. I was being overly pedantic >> in wanting SRC_URI to be "accurate". Sorry for the noise. > > You can always make an empty tarball called > texlive-collection-htmlxml-20170515.tar.xz or whatever, and use that for > SRC_URI. [intended for cygwin-apps?] -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Re: Making a package obsolete

2017-05-15 Thread Ken Brown
On 5/14/2017 1:38 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 13/05/2017 20:44, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/13/2017 7:12 AM, Jon Turney wrote: On 12/05/2017 22:02, Ken Brown wrote: I have a package that is going to become obsolete, but its contents will be distributed among several other packages. So I can't handle