Re: [PATCH] make setup mirror list more like web page not just urls

2017-11-23 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2017-11-23 14:07, Ken Brown wrote: > On 11/22/2017 11:42 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2017-11-20 15:59, Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 11/20/2017 4:30 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2017-11-17 06:53, Jon Turney wrote: On 11/17/2017 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 15/11/2017 21:35, Brian

Re: [PATCH] make setup mirror list more like web page not just urls

2017-11-23 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/22/2017 11:42 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2017-11-20 15:59, Ken Brown wrote: On 11/20/2017 4:30 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2017-11-17 06:53, Jon Turney wrote: On 11/17/2017 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote: On 15/11/2017 21:35, Brian Inglis wrote: The issue of recognizing a URL that's already

Re: [PATCH setup 00/14] Use libsolv, solve all our problems... (WIP)

2017-11-23 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes: >>> You can give each repo a priority and it will pick the package from the >>> one with the highest priority, even if another repo has a higher >>> version. >> >> Yes, that works. > > It seems that, when test versions are enabled, a test version is > preferred over a non-test

Re: [PATCH setup] site.cc, site.h: code cleanup

2017-11-23 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/22/2017 12:02 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 20/11/2017 01:26, Ken Brown wrote: Remove site_list_type::init(), which was introduced to work around a problem with gcc-2.95. Please tell me we're not actually using a placement new for these things :S Add a bool member 'is_official' to the

Re: [PATCH setup 00/14] Use libsolv, solve all our problems... (WIP)

2017-11-23 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/23/2017 1:10 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 06/09/2017 03:52, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/5/2017 2:40 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Jon Turney writes: Yeah, I'm not sure if putting the test packages into a separate repo which is disabled unless explicitly enabled is the right approach. (Instead, perhaps

Re: [PATCH setup 00/14] Use libsolv, solve all our problems... (WIP)

2017-11-23 Thread Jon Turney
On 06/09/2017 03:52, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/5/2017 2:40 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Jon Turney writes: Yeah, I'm not sure if putting the test packages into a separate repo which is disabled unless explicitly enabled is the right approach. (Instead, perhaps it is possible to tell the solver that

Re: setup with experimental libsolv-based dependency solving

2017-11-23 Thread Jon Turney
On 30/10/2017 15:52, Jon Turney wrote: On 25/10/2017 20:18, Jon Turney wrote: This has a lot of internal changes, so could use some wider testing. Please test. [...] I've replaced these with: [...] I've replaced these with: https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.882-62-g75a2e0.x86.exe