On Jul 18 17:09, Christian Franke wrote:
> Revised version which also handles the --oblivious case.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Christian
>
> Reset needs_rebasing flag to avoid that such a DLL is later removed
> from the list due to rebase failure. Add related verbose messages.
Pushed. Do you have
Hi folks,
Could we maybe turn the calm "license key" error messages causing
failing uploads down to warnings for now, until we get a handle on what
we need to change to make it valid and accurate!
It was not obvious to me that these messages were referring to the
cygport script variable
Brian Inglis writes:
> I'd like to release 1.10 which is ABI compatible, as a test release with
> libcurl4 depending on it (also mine), a lot of libraries depend on that,
> and a lot of packages depend on those; try:
>
> $ cygcheck-dep -qSN libgsasl7 | less
>
> Release 2.0 jumps to
On 2022-07-18 05:43, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 18.07.2022 07:10, Brian Inglis wrote:
I'd like to adopt orphaned package gsasl as new versions have been
released.
https://cygwin.com/packages/summary/gsasl-src.html
all yours
Revised version which also handles the --oblivious case.
--
Regards,
Christian
From 19139e1b984eb3f4d11f83e6951c66064a2f2dd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Franke
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:06:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix handling of newly added non-rebaseable DLLs
Reset
The current behavior in this (possibly rare) case is misleading.
--
Regards,
Christian
From 6a68800512ce80689efbf43e639e7c1f38371636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Franke
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 16:07:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix handling of newly added non-rebaseable DLLs
Reset
On 18.07.2022 07:10, Brian Inglis wrote:
I'd like to adopt orphaned package gsasl as new versions have been
released.
https://cygwin.com/packages/summary/gsasl-src.html
all yours
https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/gsasl.git
I've rebuilt current 1.8 and
On Jul 16 18:01, Christian Franke wrote:
> The current check for overlapping non-rebaseable DLLs uses a possible
> outdated base address. It also could not detect multiple overlaps by one
> non-rebaseable DLL.
>
> Patch size may be misleading due to indentation change.
Yeah, I diff'ed -b it for
