Re: what license is this?

On 2023-08-28 13:53, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote: Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps writes: https://github.com/jqlang/jq/blob/master/COPYING SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT AND CC-BY-3.0 AND dtoa AND ICU https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/jq/tree/jq.cygport?h=playground Their included

Re: what license is this?

> Hi, Andrew et al., > > > https://github.com/jqlang/jq/blob/master/COPYING > > Debian uses the following in its /usr/share/doc/jq/copyright file: > > License: MIT > License: CC-BY-3.0 > License: Expat > License: GPL-2.0+ > > That might help... Thank you, and Achim! And sorry for

Re: what license is this?

Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps writes: > https://github.com/jqlang/jq/blob/master/COPYING OpenSUSE License:CC-BY-3.0 AND MIT Fedora License:MIT and ASL 2.0 and CC-BY and GPLv3 Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and

Re: what license is this?

Hi, Andrew et al., > https://github.com/jqlang/jq/blob/master/COPYING Debian uses the following in its /usr/share/doc/jq/copyright file: License: MIT License: CC-BY-3.0 License: Expat License: GPL-2.0+ That might help... Yours truly, John Zaitseff -- John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email:

what license is this?

https://github.com/jqlang/jq/blob/master/COPYING Most parts of this are "as is, do what you want but preserve this notice." That has the spirit of the Beerware license[1], but it's not exactly that. I'm sure there must be another license on the SPDX list[2] that fits better, but I can't tell

Re: [Sharing progress] Tried to revive LLVM/Clang/Libc++ pkgs and port Rust

小さい猫 via Cygwin-apps writes: >> - [ ] dtc (?) > > Ah sorry... that device tree compiler cygport repo in the github org > is not related to LLVM stuffs. just i happened to need it for building > something else and it's adapted from the old cygwinports-extras[1]. OK, I thought so already, but I

Re: [PATCH cygport] Add initial support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps writes: > If the build-path changes, more files differ (cygcheck.exe, ldd.exe, > cygserver.exe) because __FILE__ is used and expands to an absolute > path name. This could be fixed by adding -fmacro-prefix and/or -ffile-prefix arguments. Regards, Achim. --

Re: [PATCH cygport] Add initial support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Christian Franke wrote: A small step towards reproducible packaging... Currently only tested with upcoming smartmontools package - contains only exe, man, doc files (no dll, lib, ...). Multiple cygport runs produce binary identical distribution tarballs if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH (from the past)