Re: [PATCH cygport] Add more checks of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2024-02-26 Thread Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps
Jon Turney wrote: On 16/02/2024 12:29, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: Fail if it is out of range. Warn if it lies in the future. Inform whether it is set or set but not exported. What is the valid range here? The range accepted by 'date -d @EPOCH ...', later used to adjust the

Re: [PATCH cygport] Add more checks of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2024-02-26 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 16/02/2024 12:29, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: Fail if it is out of range. Warn if it lies in the future. Inform whether it is set or set but not exported. What is the valid range here? Would it not make more sense to just re-export it if set? (so that commands like

Re: [cygport] enabling a replacement for "objdump -d -l"

2024-02-26 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
Thanks, this is great! On 18/02/2024 19:51, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote: [...] dwarf-parse.-pl There should be some build system changes which install this file, probably in /usr/share/cygport/tools/, which it can then be run from. --8<---cut