On 2024-03-24 11:46, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 24/03/2024 17:31, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 24/03/2024 15:07, Jon Turney wrote:
On 24/09/2023 13:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
I assume you are OK with the removal of python 3.5 (EOL Sept 2020) and 3.6
(EOL Dec
On 24/03/2024 17:31, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 24/03/2024 15:07, Jon Turney wrote:
On 24/09/2023 13:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
I assume you are OK with the removal of python 3.5 (EOL Sept 2020) and
3.6 (EOL Dec 2021)?
(I'm still dealing with cleaning up the final
On 24/03/2024 15:07, Jon Turney wrote:
On 24/09/2023 13:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
I assume you are OK with the removal of python 3.5 (EOL Sept 2020) and
3.6 (EOL Dec 2021)?
(I'm still dealing with cleaning up the final pieces of python27
detritus, but these should hopefully
On 24/09/2023 13:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Generally, we have a large number of old, unmaintained packages.
The policy [1] has always been "Packages without an active maintainer
may be pulled from the distribution.", but not actively enforced (in
fact prior to 2022, this used to
