On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:26:59PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
On 10/25/2012 11:49 AM, Jari Aalto wrote:
Neither OSI, nor FSF recommend use of public domain for Open Source
software.
I think you should total up the list of recommendations the FSF has
made over the years, and decide if you
https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git
Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side.
I am not a lawyer, and most of this parlance goes far beyond my
understanding. I wouldn't mean any harm whatsoever to this project, or
would I purposedly introduced a legal flaw by using the Public Domain
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 10 08:44, Jari Aalto wrote:
2012-10-09 21:49 David Sastre Medina
|
| P.S. keychain (also a simple shell script) is orphaned, and there's a
| new version upstream, just in case you're interested.
New upstream
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
2012-10-08 07:41 Steven Monai:
| makeself is already in the Cygwin archive.
Ok, good.
Jari,
If you want to take over mantainership of makeself, I have no
objections. According to its git log, there have been some minor improvements
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.1-2.
I'd like to release 4.1-2 as a test release, so setup.hint has
changed, too.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-2.tar.bz2
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-2.tar.bz2.sig
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.1-1.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-1.tar.bz2
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-1.tar.bz2.sig
Thanks.
--
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56
signature.asc
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.0-8.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-8.tar.bz2
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-8.tar.bz2.sig
Thanks.
--
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56
signature.asc
Hello,
Sorry to bother again.
Please upload base-files-4.0-9. Contains a fix for the bug reported in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00352.html
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-9.tar.bz2
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 04:10:54PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, David Sastre Medina wrote:
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-9.tar.bz2
Uploaded. Should 4.0-7 and 4.0-8 be removed?
Yes. Thank you.
--
Huella de clave
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.0-7.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-7.tar.bz2
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-7.tar.bz2.sig
Thanks.
--
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56
signature.asc
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:58:25PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 21:06 +0100, David Sastre wrote:
The cygport 'get' command failed because
SRC_URI=fedora/certdata.txt fedora/blacklist.txt
fedora/certdata2pem.py
Is this intended?
Short version: yes, because
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 07:19:52PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
While we're waiting for the Tcl/Tk rebuild, with gcc-4.5 out, I can
start resyncing the distro with Ports' overrides.
ca-certificates contains the Certificate Authority root certificates
needed for verifying SSL certificates.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of
them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown
up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted.
Are
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20:52PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce.
Two of
them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't
2011/3/23, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 06:24:53AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 21 22:30, marco atzeri wrote:
wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2
http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/GraphicsMagick/index.html
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.0-6. It contains corrections for the
errors reported regarding PRINTER setting and non-POSIX tests in
/etc/profile.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-6.tar.bz2
Hello,
Please upload base-files-4.0-5. It contains a bugfix to correct the
PRINTER setting in /etc/profile.
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-5.tar.bz2
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-5.tar.bz2.sig
My apologies for the misleading message
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 12 07:25, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 11 March 2011 21:26, David Sastre wrote:
Can versions before 3.9-3 be deleted?
If this is a question for me, I think they can be safely deleted now.
Keeper of the Gold Stars, please
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 05:03:37PM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
The problem appears to be back:
Sorry for not getting round to this sooner.
Hello Andy,
It should be alive again. Thanks for checking.
--
Huella de clave primaria: 0FDA C36F F110 54F4 D42B D0EB 617D 396C 448B 31EB
signature.asc
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 07:07:18AM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 5 March 2011 17:03, Andy Koppe wrote:
Actually I had already downloaded this anyway. Looks great, only two
suggestions:
- Not that it makes a great difference, but I think the interactive
checks should be done before sourcing
Hello,
I think the links to the latest revision got lost in the replies to
my question about privileged users.
In the meantime, the domain I was using expired. These are the
valid links now:
http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-3.tar.bz2
Hello,
I have corrected some stuff in the /etc/profile reported offlist by
Cyrille Lefevre and a pair of little annoyances (e.g. hostname
was not referenced by its full path).
I have a question yet: is there a consistent way of knowing
the GID of users with administrative privileges (from a
2011/1/11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 10 19:40, David Sastre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:08:06PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 6 17:04, Andrew Schulman wrote:
New package available at:
http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-2.tar.bz2
http
2011/1/11, jdzstz - gmail dot com :
2011/1/11 David Sastre :
2011/1/11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
OK
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:08:06PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 6 17:04, Andrew Schulman wrote:
New package available at:
http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-2.tar.bz2
http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-2.tar.bz2.sig
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
Can you try installing recent Cygwin snapshot
Can you try launching only failed test r00326.vtc??
Can you send me your IPv6
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
2011/1/10 David Sastre !!: ===!!¹
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
Can
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:43:31PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
I have prepared last set of packages.
- added setup.hint and README to packages
Thanks.
- cygport deleted /var/varnish empty dir when packing, fixed with
keepdir instruction in cygport
I overlooked that...
- IPv6 test
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that.
Why bump the package release on something that has never been released?
I think it makes sense
2011/1/11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
Can you try installing recent Cygwin snapshot
Can you try launching only failed test r00326.vtc??
Can you send me your IPv6 error log?
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 win7 1.7.8s(0.234/5/3) 20101229 01:34:45 i686 Cygwin
I have used a modified version
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:56:15PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
I have prepared a new set of packages, with some changes:
Building the packages from source works OK, but setup.hint and a README file
should have been included in varnish-${VERSION}.cygwin.patch.
You can let cygport generate that patch
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 05:20:14PM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 14 December 2010 20:41, David Sastre wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:50:32AM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
I'll try selective sourcing from /etc/profile e.g. bash sources
*sh, and not *.zsh, and viceversa.
Done.
On a related
On Behalf Of David Sastre
Sent: viernes, 31 de diciembre de 2010 14:19
Subject: Re: [ITP] varnish-2.1.4-1 and varnish-r5665
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:52:32PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
I have prepared two packages:
* Current: varnish 2.1.4-1 = last released version, 2.1.4
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:52:32PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
I have prepared two packages:
* Current: varnish 2.1.4-1 = last released version, 2.1.4
* Test: varnish r5665 = subversion trunk r5665 version
The packages can be downloaded from sourceforge:
wget
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:50:32AM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 10 December 2010 00:05, David Sastre wrote:
Speaking of /etc/profile.d, it seems wrong to do that from
/etc/bash.bashrc. The name of the directory suggests that its content
is for login shells only.
Absolutely. I'll try
Hello,
Regarding the ITA of base-files, I'm trying to define a consistent,
system-wide configuration that doesn't need to rely in user-defined files,
as it's currently made, and at the same time, avoid as much as possible to
source some conf files from others.
I think that this could be
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:59:32AM -0800, Karl M wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:04:39 +
From: andy
On 9 December 2010 06:29, David Sastre wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:21:38PM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 8 December 2010 21:22, David Sastre wrote:
I have decided to pull out
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:05:44AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
And given that critical files will be detected as modified (even if
they are not) because of the cmp line in preremove, existing files
remain untouched and new files end up in /etc/default/etc.
Scratch that. Preremove can't do
Hello,
I have a base-files-4.0-1 package ready to receive testing. You can fetch it
from this URL:
http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-1.tar.bz2
http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-1.tar.bz2.sig
md5sums:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:21:38PM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 8 December 2010 21:22, David Sastre wrote:
Hello,
I have a base-files-4.0-1 package ready to receive testing. You can fetch it
I'm afraid there's a syntax error in /etc/profile though:
elif [ ! -O $HOME -a ${HOME#/home
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:21:38PM +, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 8 December 2010 21:22, David Sastre wrote:
Hello,
I have a base-files-4.0-1 package ready to receive testing. You can fetch it
from this URL:
I'm afraid there's a syntax error in /etc/profile though:
elif [ ! -O $HOME
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:04:02AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 19 19:13, David Sastre wrote:
Is there a chance that this bug provides an opportunity to merge
base-files and base-passwd? I was told it was difficult (or at least
not recommended) because of a dependency chain issue
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:11:57PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 19 10:15, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:20:13PM +, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 19/11/2010 13:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 19 13:23, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 19/11/2010 13:13, Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:12:48PM +, Marco Atzeri wrote:
--- Gio 16/9/10, David Sastre ha scritto:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:08:54AM
+, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Hi
thinking about packaging slrn I decided to start
from its dependency
Oniguruma - S-lang - slrn
Just
Hello,
Regarding the ITA of these packages, and the proposed patches, I have
some thoughts to share and discuss before I repackage them.
1 http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-04/msg00521.html
case sensitivity of system32 dir (win7 and vista)
2 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00503.html
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:50:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 17 13:59, David Sastre wrote:
Regarding the ITA of these packages, and the proposed patches, I have
some thoughts to share and discuss before I repackage them.
2 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00503.html
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:08:54AM +, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Hi
thinking about packaging slrn I decided to start
from its dependency
Oniguruma - S-lang - slrn
Just in case it could be useful in any way, I've attached a
cygport file for S-Lang. AFAICT, it builds and works OK.
The only
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:54:05AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi John,
On Sep 13 10:33, John Morrison wrote:
It is with regrets that I give up the maintainership of the cygwin
base-files and base-passwd packages.
I've been unable to find sufficient time to do these packages
Hello,
Please upload:
wget http://eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/makeself/makeself-2.1.5-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/makeself/makeself-2.1.5-2.tar.bz2
Regards.
Hello,
And there's really no reason to repeat the RFU mail *every* day.
Sorry for that. I suppossed the subject was wrong (ITP instead of RFU)
and could have been unnoticed.
Thanks and regards.
51 matches
Mail list logo
