.
It is my understanding that one of the moderators will then inspect this
message and prepend [ANNOUNCEMENT] to the subject.
Cheers,
Joe
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:24:54AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 7 08:02, Joe Linoff wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 6 19:38, Joe Linoff wrote:
Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation
The distribution can be uploaded from:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
Thanks.
if this was not the correct forum for this type
of verification. If that is the case, can you point me in the right
direction?
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation
The distribution can be uploaded from:
http
if this was not the correct forum for this type
of verification. If that is the case, can you point me in the right
direction?
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation
The distribution can be uploaded from:
http
Should I re-submit this with the ITP designation?
Reini Urban wrote:
Joe Linoff schrieb:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already
in the public
Reini Urban wrote:
Reini Urban schrieb:
You need a subject like: [ITP] ccdoc 08.41
Why this funny version number?
It should be called ccdoc-0.8.41 imho.
Or if MAJOR is 8 leave the 0 away = ccdoc-8.41
This is irritating.
Thanks for the insight.
I would strongly prefer ccdoc-0.8.41 but the cygwin
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
Any reason for sending this multiple times?
What everyone seems to be missing
Hi:
Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
There are no cygwin related changes.
Thanks,
Joe
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs
Hi Pavel:
Thanks for taking the time to detail the issues. It really helps novices like
me:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I've made a brief review of the packaging, but not the functionality. Here
is a list of problems that need to be fixed:
1) The source package includes files/dirs left by tools
I like that even better.
I will re-submit this request today with this version number.
Thank you for your patience.
Joe
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Joe Linoff wrote:
Ccdoc has been using that convention (A.B.C-D) for last 3 years or so.
The
current version 0.8
Hi Folks:
I have fixed the version number with Pavel's help.
I have a package that I would like to add to cygwin.
setup.hint
@ ccdoc
category: Dev
requires: cygwin
version: 0.8.39-1
sdesc: "Generates HTML documentation for C++
interfaces."
ldesc: "Automatically generates HTML web
Hi Folks:
I have a package that I would like to add to cygwin.
setup.hint
@ ccdoc
category: Dev
requires: cygwin
version: 0.8-39
sdesc: Generates HTML documentation for C++ interfaces.
ldesc: Automatically generates HTML web documentation from C++
programs by
14 matches
Mail list logo
