Re: Unable to 'git push' to /git/cygwin-packages/*

2024-03-15 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
On 3/14/2024 11:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: [...] You may also want to use https:// rather than git:// for reading the repository these days, given the insecurity of the git protocol. Right. I now remember this recommendation too. I will make the change in all the git

Re: Unable to 'git push' to /git/cygwin-packages/*

2024-03-15 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
On 3/14/2024 9:07 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 14/03/2024 15:39, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 3/14/2024 2:42 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 14/03/2024 05:45, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: Hi folks, I'm getting the error: fatal: remote error: service

Re: Unable to 'git push' to /git/cygwin-packages/*

2024-03-14 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
On 3/14/2024 2:42 AM, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 14/03/2024 05:45, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: Hi folks, I'm getting the error: fatal: remote error: service not enabled: /git/cygwin-packages/sshfs when I attempt 'git push' to that repository.  The same happens with all

Unable to 'git push' to /git/cygwin-packages/*

2024-03-13 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi folks, I'm getting the error: fatal: remote error: service not enabled: /git/cygwin-packages/sshfs when I attempt 'git push' to that repository. The same happens with all the repositories for my packages. It's been this way for a couple days at least. Have I forgotten some step in the

Request for import of git repository history

2024-01-28 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi folks, I'm finally getting around to setting up the centralized git repositories for the packages I maintain. There is currently no history for the cygutils package. Could I please have its history imported with ctm2git? Thanks much, ..mark

Re: [NMU] inkscape 0.92.3-2 (Test)

2023-12-22 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
This test version of inkscape has been promoted to current. Apologies to JonT who probably has to help this through again. Next time I do this will be after I ITA the thing. Thanks & Regards, ..mark

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-21 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: Is anyone looking at QT5 and QT6 ? I've "looked at" Qt5 in the past, though not to the point of being able to take it over. I have a patch for the qterminal issue that I'd like to contribute. There's issues I've had building this I haven't had the time to

Re: [NMU] inkscape 0.92.3-2 (Test)

2023-12-13 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote: Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps writes: I've uploaded a non-maintainer re-build of the existing inkscape 0.92.3. This attempts to work around a problem with the current inkscape reported to exit with 127 error code (missing DLL). This build was produced with gcc-g

Re: [NMU] inkscape 0.92.3-2 (Test)

2023-12-01 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi Jon, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 30/11/2023 00:38, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: Not sure of the logistical process for doing a non-maintainer update. If I've missed something please let me know. > Thanks very much for looking into this. You're welcome. It was a curi

[NMU] inkscape 0.92.3-2 (Test)

2023-11-29 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
I've uploaded a non-maintainer re-build of the existing inkscape 0.92.3. This attempts to work around a problem with the current inkscape reported to exit with 127 error code (missing DLL). This build was produced with gcc-g++ 7.4 while the current build was produced with gcc-g++ 6.4. Newer

Kindly update my SSH public key

2023-11-28 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Name: Mark Geisert BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Comment: "256-bit ED25519, converted by Mark@zotac from OpenSSH" C3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5IP1ks1stdrx1ofmpCBnQWdJ2zt9qlnNqrCX0y15INZHf END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY

Re: can't compile coreutils-9.3 any more after upgrade to cygwin-3.4.8

2023-09-02 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Sep 1 03:28, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: I then tried recompiling a CPU affinity test program of mine (that uses cpusets) but it could not link due to missing __cpuset_alloc and __cpuset_free. I think this is likely a local issue of mine

Re: can't compile coreutils-9.3 any more after upgrade to cygwin-3.4.8

2023-09-01 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi Corinna, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30 20:10, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30 12:04, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 2023-08-30 06:17, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30 11:57, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30

Re: can't compile coreutils-9.3 any more after upgrade to cygwin-3.4.8

2023-08-31 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30 11:57, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Aug 30 11:34, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: #define CPU_ZERO_S(siz, set) __cpuset_zero_s (siz, set) -static __inline void -__cpuset_zero_s (size_t siz, cpu_set_t *set) -{ - (void)

Re: can't compile coreutils-9.3 any more after upgrade to cygwin-3.4.8

2023-08-30 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
[redirected from the main Cygwin ML] Hi Corinna, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: On Aug 25 22:50, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote: Hi Corinna, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: On Aug 24 14:39, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote: Denis Excoffier via Cygwin wrote: Hello, When i try to compile

Test failures from 'cygport python39.cygport test' etc

2023-02-27 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi Marco, I'm seeing test failures and hangs on the 'cygport test' step for both Python 3.9 and 3.8. 3.9 has 37 failures out of 423 tests, 3.8 has 39 failures out of 425 tests. Both releases have 3 tests hanging after as much as 20 minutes wait w/no cputime: test_asyncio, test_ssl, test_io.

Concerning Python patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch -- ping Marco

2023-02-10 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
thon patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:07:02 -0800 From: Mark Geisert To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Hi Marco, Recently there's been a complaint about that patch on the Cygwin mailing list. The patch was meant to allow same-machine communication between Cygwin Python programs via

Concerning Python patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch

2022-11-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, Recently there's been a complaint about that patch on the Cygwin mailing list. The patch was meant to allow same-machine communication between Cygwin Python programs via an AF_UNIX socket. The patch works because both ends of the connection are Python programs that have the patch.

Re: resolv.conf and gnupg2

2022-08-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Marco Atzeri wrote: Hi, currently as default Gnupg 2.x is unable to contact keyservers and recover any key. Gnupg 1.x has not such problem $  /usr/bin/gpg2 --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5981E818 gpg: keyserver receive failed: No such file or directory The cryptic message is due to

Re: fuse

2022-04-15 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Jon, Achim, Jon Turney wrote: On 01/02/2022 06:20, ASSI wrote: Mark Geisert writes: I see that 'mtr' is another Cygwin package that makes use of a Windows driver via libpcap.  Maybe I can use mtr.cygport etc as a guide; I'm unsure whether a Cygwin package should be including Windows

Re: [ITP] cygfuse -- cygport issues solved

2022-03-27 Thread Mark Geisert
Mark Geisert wrote: Hi Jon, Thanks for the helpful review comments. cygport is a wondrous tool. My issues were solved by making a simple tar.xz of my local source tree, renaming it to have the version number expected by the cygport script, placing that file and the cygport script in a test

Re: [ITP] cygfuse

2022-03-25 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Jon, Thanks for the helpful review comments. More below. Jon Turney wrote: On 10/03/2022 06:16, Mark Geisert wrote: [...]> A few small comments on the cygport file HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/mgeisert/cygfuse; #SRC_URI="http://maxrnd.com/~mark/cygwin/x86_64/release/cygfuse

Re: [ITP] sshfs

2022-03-10 Thread Mark Geisert
Marco Atzeri wrote: On 10.03.2022 08:22, Mark Geisert wrote: This is a Cygwin port of the FUSE app sshfs that can be found in various Linux [...] added to cygwin-pkg-maint list Thanks Marco for both adds. Cheers, ..mark

[ITP] sshfs

2022-03-09 Thread Mark Geisert
This is a Cygwin port of the FUSE app sshfs that can be found in various Linux distributions. It allows mounting a remote directory via ssh onto a local directory. It requires cygfuse. sshfs is a subproject of the Linux-focused libfuse project. The initial project files for review are

[ITP] cygfuse

2022-03-09 Thread Mark Geisert
This is a Cygwin version of libfuse{,3} that can be found in various Linux distributions. It is a couple of link libraries and additions to /usr/include to allow porting of FUSE apps. FUSE: File System In User Space. I will shortly be providing an sshfs FUSE app, to be covered by a separate

Re: Go or Rust Packages?

2022-02-04 Thread Mark Geisert
Brian Inglis wrote: On 2022-02-02 02:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb  1 21:22, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: The upstream fzf package moved from Ruby to Go some time ago.  I had vague but noble intetions to try to maintain a fork on the basis of the last version of the Ruby code, but never managed

Re: fuse

2022-02-03 Thread Mark Geisert
One final reply to myself on this topic.. Thomas Wolff wrote: What became of the winfsp-fuse project discussed in July 2016? I'd like to be able to use ftpfs or sshfs in cygwin. Integration of the project into Cygwin stalled around that time, or was it 2018? [...] I've now looked at and

Re: fuse

2022-01-31 Thread Mark Geisert
Replying to myself... Mark Geisert wrote: Hi Thomas, Thomas Wolff wrote: What became of the winfsp-fuse project discussed in July 2016? I'd like to be able to use ftpfs or sshfs in cygwin. Integration of the project into Cygwin stalled around that time, or was it 2018? [...] I would love

Re: fuse

2022-01-09 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Thomas, Thomas Wolff wrote: What became of the winfsp-fuse project discussed in July 2016? I'd like to be able to use ftpfs or sshfs in cygwin. Integration of the project into Cygwin stalled around that time, or was it 2018? ISTR there was an objection from the Dokany FUSE project about

Re: Unable to push to cygutils git repo on sourceware

2021-09-14 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Jon, Jon Turney wrote: On 07/09/2021 04:46, Mark Geisert wrote: Something's likely changed in the 4 years since I last did this :-). ..or something allegedly similar to this... too much code under the bridge... $ git push fatal: remote error: service not enabled: /git/cygwin

Unable to push to cygutils git repo on sourceware

2021-09-06 Thread Mark Geisert
Something's likely changed in the 4 years since I last did this :-). $ git push fatal: remote error: service not enabled: /git/cygwin-cygutils.git $ cat .git/config [core] # blah elided [remote "origin"] url = git://sourceware.org/git/cygwin-cygutils.git fetch =

Is it possible to 'cygport upload' with same p-v-r?

2021-08-28 Thread Mark Geisert
HI all,B I'd like to re-spin the latest version of cygutils, that is, upload newer files with the same release number (1.4.16-5). Is this possible, or do we now always change the release# when uploading? Thanks, ..mark

Re: [PATCH] cygutils/cygdrop: fix return type of usageCore

2021-05-26 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Jeremy, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote: Fixes a warning "no return statement in function returning non-void", and solves a crash running --help. Hopefully this is the right place for this now, since I am not interesting in becoming a package maintainer as the list description says ;)

Re: python > 3.5: Issue with unix domain sockets

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 04.05.2021 06:41, Mark Geisert wrote: Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 5/3/2021 8:57 AM, Maximilian.Blenk--- via Cygwin wrote: Incorrect Behavior: Server: $ python3.7 server.py starting up on ./uds_socket waiting for a connection Traceback (most

Re: binutils 2.36.1

2021-02-27 Thread Mark Geisert
Achim Gratz wrote: Before releasing binutils 2.35.2, I had already built 2.36 (which was released two days earlier), but it became almost immediately clear that there were problems. Now that 2.36.1 came out I tried again (not that the changes would indicate anything addressing those problems)

Re: Extreme slowdown due to malloc?

2021-01-17 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Achim, Thank you very much for the detailed instructions and also the comparison data Linux vs Cygwin for all those testcases. Achim Gratz wrote: ASSI writes: I have a Cygwin malloc speedup patch that *might* help the m-t part. I'll prepare and submit that to cygwin-patches shortly.

Re: [ATTN MAINTAINER] qt5-base

2021-01-01 Thread Mark Geisert
Achim Gratz wrote: [some nifty stuff with puzzlers in it...] Unfortunately I can't help with the qt5 build questions. Been down that path and gotten lost. But if/when you have a package ready for test installation, I can shortly thereafter provide a patch to qt5-base that fixes the

Re: python fails asyncio tests (py 3.7 & 3.8)

2020-12-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 17.12.2020 10:20, Mark Geisert wrote: Hi Marco, Below is the patch I developed to work around the problem report in https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-November/246830.html I called the patch file 3.8.3-peercred

Re: Extreme slowdown due to malloc?

2020-12-21 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Achim, Achim Gratz wrote: I've been experimenting a bit with ZStandard dictionaries. The dictionary builder is probably not the most optimized piece of software Is this what leads you to suspect malloc? Really heavy use of malloc? and if you feed it large amounts of data it needs quite

python fails asyncio tests (py 3.7 & 3.8)

2020-12-17 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, Below is the patch I developed to work around the problem report in https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-November/246830.html I called the patch file 3.8.3-peercred-cygwin.patch. I am unable to test the patch myself because of continuing problems building a new Python. I don't

Re: Failure during build of Python 3.8 via cygport

2020-12-13 Thread Mark Geisert
Mark Geisert wrote: This seems to be a problem setting up a platform-specific build directory. The sysconfig.py script wants to use "lib." + platform + pythonversion but the platform string somehow gets corrupted into non-utf8 bytes.  For instance, building Python 3.

Re: Failure during build of Python 3.8 via cygport

2020-12-11 Thread Mark Geisert
[replying to myself again...] A similar problem happens when building 3.6 and 3.7 too. Details at end. On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Mark Geisert wrote: Hi Marco, I was building Python locally so I can later submit a patch against it. It appears the local python.exe was built successfully

Failure during build of Python 3.8 via cygport

2020-12-09 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, I was building Python locally so I can later submit a patch against it. It appears the local python.exe was built successfully, but a later step failed with: ./python.exe -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars ;\ if test $? -ne 0 ; then \ echo "generate-posix-vars failed"

ATWIL ?

2020-10-27 Thread Mark Geisert
Does it mean "All The World Is Linux" or something else? ..mark

Re: cygwinports domains

2020-09-21 Thread Mark Geisert
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: My domain registrations cygwinports.com, cygwinports.net, and cygwinports.org will expire very soon. If anyone would like to adopt them for the Cygwin project, please let me know ASAP. Otherwise, I will let them lapse. Hi Yaakov, I'm willing to adopt them if only to

Re: zsh 5.8: configure fails only on 32bit

2020-06-23 Thread Mark Geisert
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: Thank you for reply, and sorry for late response. From: ASSI Subject: Re: zsh 5.8: configure fails only on 32bit Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 07:53:25 +0200 To me that indicates either BLODA interference or that you run into some limit (e.g. on environment size or PATH

"non-unique current versions" error from calm

2020-04-13 Thread Mark Geisert
I tried uploading my re-spin of util-linux (2.33.1-2) but received the following error report on both x86_64 and x86 uploads: ERROR: install packages from source package 'e2fsprogs' have non-unique current versions 2.33.1-2 (uuidd), 1.44.5-1 (4 others) I see it's talking about sub-packages of

[ITA] util-linux

2020-04-06 Thread Mark Geisert
I'd like to adopt util-linux from Yaakov if that's possible. To that end I've re-spun the current (for Cygwin) 2.33.1 release with additional patches to enable building 'taskset' and 'chrt'. Taskset works, chrt "works" but can't do anything useful. Tested both 64- and 32-bit Cygwin. I've

util-linux update?

2020-03-03 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Yaakov, May I update the version of util-linux available on Cygwin? Your cygport file for the current 2.33.1 seems to work fine for the latest 2.35.1. I would add a patch file 2.33.1-cygwin-cpuset.patch (see attached) and update the cygport file to reference this additional patch and

Towards support of taskset(1) within util-linux package

2019-06-24 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Yaakov, I patched util-linux locally to build the 'taskset' tool so I could test my implementation of the get- and set-affinity functions within Cygwin. The implementation will be part of the upcoming Cygwin 3.1.0 release. I'm not sure how to manipulate the build environment so I could

Re: setup 2.894 release candidate - please test

2018-10-15 Thread Mark Geisert
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 14 13:29, Achim Gratz wrote: Marco Atzeri writes: May I have a hippo for Jon ? +1 +1 +1 Looks and works great in my limited testing. ..mark

Re: [PATCH libtirpc] Disable libtirpc's own bindresvport{,_sa}() in favor of Cygwin's

2018-02-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2018-02-07 01:29, Mark Geisert wrote: I don't have libtirpc in git so I'm submitting a text patch. Sorry for any inconvenience. This is Cygwin-specific and against src/bindresvport.c of libtirpc 1.0.1. Unsure if it ought to go upstream; appreciate input

Re: [PATCH libtirpc] Disable libtirpc's own bindresvport{,_sa}() in favor of Cygwin's

2018-02-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Brian Inglis wrote: On 2018-02-07 08:38, Eric Blake wrote: On 02/07/2018 01:29 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: I don't have libtirpc in git so I'm submitting a text patch. Sorry for any inconvenience. This is Cygwin-specific and against src/bindresvport.c of libtirpc 1.0.1. Unsure if it ought to go

[PATCH libtirpc] Disable libtirpc's own bindresvport{,_sa}() in favor of Cygwin's

2018-02-06 Thread Mark Geisert
I don't have libtirpc in git so I'm submitting a text patch. Sorry for any inconvenience. This is Cygwin-specific and against src/bindresvport.c of libtirpc 1.0.1. Unsure if it ought to go upstream; appreciate input on that. Thanks much, ..mark 8< 35a36,38 > /* On Cygwin

Re: libtool not finding /usr/lib/libintl.la or what?

2017-07-01 Thread Mark Geisert
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 01/07/2017 07:47, Mark Geisert wrote: Esteemed co-conspirators, I've been pulling my hair out trying to build a new cygutils package on 32-bit Cygwin. The exact same source package builds fine on 64-bit but 32-bit fails with the following... CC

libtool not finding /usr/lib/libintl.la or what?

2017-06-30 Thread Mark Geisert
Esteemed co-conspirators, I've been pulling my hair out trying to build a new cygutils package on 32-bit Cygwin. The exact same source package builds fine on 64-bit but 32-bit fails with the following... make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/cygutils-test/cygutils-1.4.16-1.i686/build'

Re: cygfuse

2016-09-20 Thread Mark Geisert
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 9/8/16, 1:03 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we have a consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it. I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral about FUSE

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-08 Thread Mark Geisert
Herbert Stocker wrote: Maybe somebody wants to use WinFSP for Windows programs and Dokan for Cygwin programs. There should be some user setting for the case both are installed. Maybe some cygfuse-admin command could do the job. This kind of flexibility would be nice. We can of course only

cygfuse (was Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8)

2016-09-08 Thread Mark Geisert
Mark Geisert wrote: [... some stuff ...] I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we have a consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it. I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral about FUSE implementations. It can be seen at https

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-06 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Adrien, I want to dig a little further into this... Adrien JUND wrote: I have tried to see how to integrate Dokan in cygfuse and it is currently hard linked to WinFSP and makes hard the integration for others FS. A neutral interface with common operations should be made to fix the situation.

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-05 Thread Mark Geisert
Adrien JUND wrote: Separate from that, it's been a little work disentangling the meaning of various names used for this project. Here's what I think the names mean: FUSE - a protocol, which exists in different versions WinFSP - a Windows-native DLL mapping FUSE 2.8 ops to/from Windows file

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-05 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Mark, hi: On 8/22/16, 12:43 PM, cygwin-apps-ow...@cygwin.com on behalf of Mark Geisert wrote: > I'm debugging some faulting test programs so this cygfuse code doesn't seem fully ready for prime time just yet. I'm sure Bill had it working so it's likely to be s

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-08-22 Thread Mark Geisert
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mark, did you find out how to move the repo under the Cygwin org in the meantime? Is it the "Import repository" functionality by any chance? Hi Corinna, Bill and I worked it out on a different thread of this conversation. I currently have a public

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-08-17 Thread Mark Geisert
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 29 11:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 29 02:15, Mark Geisert wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 29 01:19, Mark Geisert wrote: Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/28/16, 5:17 PM, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Ok. I did the transfer (twice, because of some

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/29/16, 1:19 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: FWIW I've signed up with GitHub with username mgeisert. I think I need to be invited to join the cygwin@github org. Then maybe I can transfer your repo to me? Corrections welcome... Hey, Mark. I just transferred

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Geisert
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 29 01:19, Mark Geisert wrote: Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/28/16, 5:17 PM, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Ok. I did the transfer (twice, because of some ambiguous GitHub messages). Someone from cygwin’s side has to accept the repo within a day according to GitHub

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/28/16, 5:17 PM, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Ok. I did the transfer (twice, because of some ambiguous GitHub messages). Someone from cygwin’s side has to accept the repo within a day according to GitHub. Turns out I can transfer a repo to another user, but not to

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Hi, Mark: On 7/28/16, 10:29 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: Please be mindful if you intend to test that the current released binary of WinFsp does not support Windows 7. This is because the last release erroneously uses a Windows 8 only API (GetOverlappedResultEx). It's

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/28/16, 1:04 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 28 19:13, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Mark: I agree with how you want to adjust license and transfer ownership. I don't have a presence on GitHub but I should be able to grab cygfuse anyway. Thank you very much

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Mark: I agree with how you want to adjust license and transfer ownership. I don't have a presence on GitHub but I should be able to grab cygfuse anyway. Thank you very much for agreeing to become the maintainer for [CYGFUSE]. Please consider this post as my public

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/28/16, Mark Geisert wrote: Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Please be mindful if you intend to test that the current released binary of WinFsp does not support Windows 7. This is because the last release erroneously uses a Windows 8 only API (GetOverlappedResultEx

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: Please be mindful if you intend to test that the current released binary of WinFsp does not support Windows 7. This is because the last release erroneously uses a Windows 8 only API (GetOverlappedResultEx). It's your call obviously but do you want to forgo Win 7

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-27 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos writes: > To test that things work, clone my sshfs repo from: > > https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs > > And issue the following commands: > > $ autoreconf -i > $ ./configure On my test machine (Win7 64, Cygwin 64) I get the errors shown below. But first let

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-26 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos writes: > BTW, here is another alternative that I have been mulling around. > [...] Very interesting. I'll need a little more time to investigate; github is throwing unicorns at the moment. Could the Dokany folks consider whether this kind of wrapping might work for them

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-26 Thread Mark Geisert
Adrien JUND writes: > >You could define a package "fuse" with no contents and a dependency on > >package "winfsp-fuse". Then later when/if another FUSE implementation > >becomes available, "somebody" could replace the "fuse" package with > >whatever is required to get alternatives support for

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-26 Thread Mark Geisert
Bill Zissimopoulos writes: > - Rename the package to winfsp-fuse, but have it somehow “satisfy” > packages that require “fuse” (e.g. SSHFS, FUSEPY). This would allow > multiple *-fuse packages to exist in the setup database and the user > chooses which one they want. My understanding based on

Re: unison-2.48 build fails with latest ocaml and flexdll (ping: Yaakov, Damien)

2016-04-29 Thread Mark Geisert
Mark Geisert wrote: the relocation error is different in a 5.3.0 object than a 4.9.2 object such as ^ 4.8.2 So for your case I'd first try rebasing flexdll.so down to 0xeff3 (you may collide with something else so pay

Re: SSH key for upload access

2016-01-17 Thread Mark Geisert
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jan 17 01:50, Mark Geisert wrote: Name: Mark Geisert Package: cygutils BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Applied, please test that it works. Works fine; thanks much! ..mark

SSH key for upload access

2016-01-17 Thread Mark Geisert
Name: Mark Geisert Package: cygutils BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY Comment: "4096-bit RSA, converted by Mark@zotac from OpenSSH" B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQDaZYFNfPTl20P8ASod06gPtRPVDlwWbDr1YaQcxN G4lfl8+fhcBl4G6X/wrhzo+oDxzVErHniAZfR8TyMp3F4l02/BufQ5JgUzfMG+g2E8y4Sv LTqkg

Re: [ITA] cygutils

2015-11-19 Thread Mark Geisert
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Packaging looks good. Just one nit: While this is as Chuck did it way back when, I think the files under /usr/share/doc should go into the base cygutils package, rather than the cygutils-extra package, i.e. usr/share/doc/cygutils/AUTHORS

Re: [ITA] cygutils

2015-11-15 Thread Mark Geisert
Sorry, the links are busted. Let me fix and re-post. Sheesh. ..mark On Sun, 15 Nov 2015, Mark Geisert wrote: I think my ITA is sorted out well enough to be reviewed. If you find a sharp edge somewhere, please don't assume it's maintainer preference; it's more likely maintainer ignorance

Re: [ITA] cygutils

2015-11-15 Thread Mark Geisert
I think my ITA is sorted out well enough to be reviewed. If you find a sharp edge somewhere, please don't assume it's maintainer preference; it's more likely maintainer ignorance so please do fill me in. The following links are all relative to http://maxrnd.com/~mark/cygwin/.

Re: Still unable to 'git push' or ssh to sourceware -- resolved

2015-11-12 Thread Mark Geisert
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: You're missing something important. The key you sent to sware and the other key you sent to the cygwin-apps list are both the public part of your keys. This public part of a key *never* requires a passphrase. After all it's supposed to be readable

Still unable to 'git push' or ssh to sourceware

2015-11-09 Thread Mark Geisert
Apologies for my continued stumbling around with this. I'm enough of a newbie in several necessary skills that I can't seem to get a handle on what's going wrong. I had assumed that having sent my "SSH key for upload access", it goes to the same location as my original key supplied on the

Re: Still unable to 'git push' or ssh to sourceware

2015-11-09 Thread Mark Geisert
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 17:54 -0800, Mark Geisert wrote: I had assumed that having sent my "SSH key for upload access", it goes to the same location as my original key supplied on the sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi form. Incorrec

SSH key for upload access

2015-11-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Name: Mark Geisert Package: cygutils BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY B3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAPqsi50rpgqK96tXNgBYvenDeC/cd2uNOlWd6Lnir7UkrouasK cvzTjmonCqcjdNNND8ckSWr0mx2Vr1tlLAFziqRQN6WPzOISBsqbazB8LQ1OMfzjN2QNQN 0I2cQyoxkQGaRJZwucxYHTIRHIK7Os6k9Klwxh76FGNBUtzqrhfPFQDoP+1qKyKwV9 YVvI

Re: Questions on package adoption conventions

2015-11-04 Thread Mark Geisert
I was able to 'git clone' the cygutils source tree and fix user-reported issues and my build issues. I'm ready to push the updates but have hit a snag... 8< git push origin master fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access

Re: Questions on package adoption conventions

2015-10-31 Thread Mark Geisert
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 31 00:18, Jon Turney wrote: On 30/10/2015 23:25, Mark Geisert wrote: I was confused by the SRC_URI= line in cygutils.cygport. Does that merely indicate where this package came from at the time the .cygport file was written, or does it denote

Questions on package adoption conventions

2015-10-30 Thread Mark Geisert
Q1: Does a new maintainer typically put out a new package version upon take-over, or can he/she run with the existing version number and just keep bumping the build number (e.g. for bug fixes)? Q2: Does the location hosting a test build for external review have to be the same location used to

Re: [ITA] cygutils

2015-10-28 Thread Mark Geisert
Corinna is climbing down the vaults to polish goldstars... Awarded! http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#MG A bit early, this one ;) Oops Want me to add a stinkbomb to offset, until he makes good? +1 motivational