Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-22 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2018-03-22 08:41, Ken Brown wrote: > On 3/21/2018 8:35 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2018-03-21 12:14, Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 3/20/2018 4:11 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: > I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. Thanks. > By the

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-22 Thread Jon Turney
On 21/03/2018 18:14, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/20/2018 4:11 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. Thanks. By the way, this only affects local installs.  For network installs, the hash gets checked at an earlier stage. That's

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-22 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/21/2018 8:35 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2018-03-21 12:14, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/20/2018 4:11 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. Thanks. By the way, this only affects local installs.  For network installs, the hash

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-21 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2018-03-21 12:14, Ken Brown wrote: > On 3/20/2018 4:11 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: >> Ken Brown writes: >>> I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. >> >> Thanks. >> >>> By the way, this only affects local installs.  For network installs, >>> the hash gets checked at an

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-21 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/20/2018 4:11 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. Thanks. By the way, this only affects local installs. For network installs, the hash gets checked at an earlier stage. That's correct. I forgot to mention that, but

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > I'll look into both of these issues, unless Jon beats me to it. Thanks. > By the way, this only affects local installs. For network installs, > the hash gets checked at an earlier stage. That's correct. I forgot to mention that, but all my installs are from a local mirror

Re: [Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-20 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/20/2018 2:23 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: I've found out the hard way that a dodgy package file no longer gets ignored by setup and is installed without any error unless you care to look in setup.log.full. That was hard to figure out because in my case some stupid error on mirroring just made

[Bug] Re3gression in setup handling of SHA512 checksum failures

2018-03-20 Thread Achim Gratz
I've found out the hard way that a dodgy package file no longer gets ignored by setup and is installed without any error unless you care to look in setup.log.full. That was hard to figure out because in my case some stupid error on mirroring just made each file miss a few bytes off the end, so