Hansom writes:
BTW: what about glib-1.2/gtk-1.2 ? There're some applications still using them,
such as wmakerconf and dillo.
We just need a maintainer, then they could be added to te netrelease
too. I decided to go with GTK2 because I want to have GIMP and other
GUI applications which will
Hansom Young wrote:
As to the prefix (/opt/gnome2 or standard /), headache
If it's not /opt/gnome2, we have to rebuild most packages when we have glib2/gtk2 from
Cygwin net release.
What's the others' opinion?
BTW, did you think about how you're going to set this up? While
non-glib/gtk
Hi, Yaakov and all friends on cygwin-apps:
I'm very glad that gtk+/gnome packages could get into Cygwin net release.
If these packages were got into cygwin net release, I think there would be more people
get involved, and these packages have chances to get more mature and stable.
(Currently,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:38:22AM +0800, Hansom Young wrote:
As to the prefix (/opt/gnome2 or standard /), headache If it's
not /opt/gnome2, we have to rebuild most packages when we have
glib2/gtk2 from Cygwin net release. What's the others' opinion?
I'm not against using /opt. I
