Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-18 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" > > does not. > > The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire > dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only th

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Lapo Luchini wrote: > PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" > does not. The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only those that the

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Igor Peshansky wrote: > >>> . > >> Doh? ;-) > > Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO > > list... :-) > > Uh.. not exactly: I was "doh"ing to the fact that that I'm not quite as > active

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Lapo Luchini
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > setup.hint should only include direct dependencies OK, noted (for next revision). PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" does not. -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP & X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Lapo Luchini
Igor Peshansky wrote: >>> . >> Doh? ;-) > Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO > list... :-) Uh.. not exactly: I was "doh"ing to the fact that that I'm not quite as active as Jari is, in adopting packages 0=) (second hint: #JAa

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Igor Peshansky wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >> On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > >> > >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > >>> >

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Lapo Luchini
Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> >> Looks good, uploaded. >> Thanks for takin

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Corinna Vinschen writes: > On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 >> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > Looks good, uploaded. setup.hint should only include direct dependencies: cygport nano-

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > > Looks good, uploaded. > Thanks for taking over, > Corinna

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. Thanks for taking over, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Pr

Re: [ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Gareth Pearce
Lapo Luchini wrote: Lapo Luchini wrote: Hi Gareth, just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? htt

[ITA] nano package

2007-12-17 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: > Hi Gareth, > just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x > branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/