On 05/03/2015 12:38, Michael DePaulo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Michael DePaulo
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 08:49 -0500, Michael DePaulo wrote:
The benefit to Cygwin is that we will have a commonly used[1]
benchmark for
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Michael DePaulo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 08:49 -0500, Michael DePaulo wrote:
>>> The benefit to Cygwin is that we will have a commonly used[1]
>>> benchmark for testing Cygwin/X performance.
>>>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 08:49 -0500, Michael DePaulo wrote:
>> The benefit to Cygwin is that we will have a commonly used[1]
>> benchmark for testing Cygwin/X performance.
>>
>> Thank you Jon Turney for helping me package this.
>>
Now at r
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 08:49 -0500, Michael DePaulo wrote:
> The benefit to Cygwin is that we will have a commonly used[1]
> benchmark for testing Cygwin/X performance.
>
> Thank you Jon Turney for helping me package this.
>
> https://github.com/mikedep333/gtkperf-cygport
> Currently at commit e70
The benefit to Cygwin is that we will have a commonly used[1]
benchmark for testing Cygwin/X performance.
Thank you Jon Turney for helping me package this.
https://github.com/mikedep333/gtkperf-cygport
Currently at commit e707eaa
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gtkperf
https://packages.d
