On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:58:08AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 13 September 2010 18:26, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/13/2010 6:52 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new headers tarballs up. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
All packages are uploaded.
A big round of applause for JonY, Chuck, and Yaakov for the
On 9/12/2010 10:24 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/13/2010 01:01, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/11/2010 2:07 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new files are up, same links.
Err...the pthread packages seem to be missing...
Sorry about that, pthreads now uploaded.
OK, all packages rebuild fine from souce. Also, now we
On 9/13/2010 6:52 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new headers tarballs up. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
All packages are uploaded. Please wait 24 hours until they can
propagate to the mirrors, then post announcements to cygwin-announce.
Please look at the suggested templates here:
On Sep 13 13:26, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/13/2010 6:52 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new headers tarballs up. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
All packages are uploaded. Please wait 24 hours until they can
propagate to the mirrors, then post announcements to cygwin-announce.
Chuck, can you please
On 9/13/2010 2:16 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Chuck, can you please update http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint, too?
Done.
On 13 September 2010 18:26, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/13/2010 6:52 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new headers tarballs up. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
All packages are uploaded.
A big round of applause for JonY, Chuck, and Yaakov for the huge
amount of work they've put into this.
Andy
On 9/11/2010 2:07 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new files are up, same links.
Err...the pthread packages seem to be missing...
--
Chuck
On 9/13/2010 01:01, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/11/2010 2:07 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, new files are up, same links.
Err...the pthread packages seem to be missing...
Sorry about that, pthreads now uploaded.
On 9/10/2010 08:51, JonY wrote:
On 9/10/2010 07:09, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/9/2010 6:10 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, we're amost there.
binutils and runtime are GTG.
gcc, headers, and pthreads are really close.
Everything rebuilds from source fine, and the uploaded packages actually
match the
On 9/2/2010 01:35, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/1/2010 11:44 AM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 23:15, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 11:20 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 10:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
Strange, I'll try a rebuild. The former should be the correct
On 9/9/2010 6:10 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, we're amost there.
binutils and runtime are GTG.
gcc, headers, and pthreads are really close.
Everything rebuilds from source fine, and the uploaded packages actually
match the rebuilt versions (or vice versa). So that's all good. Plus, I
was able to
On 9/10/2010 07:09, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/9/2010 6:10 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, we're amost there.
binutils and runtime are GTG.
gcc, headers, and pthreads are really close.
Everything rebuilds from source fine, and the uploaded packages actually
match the rebuilt versions (or vice
On 8/31/2010 11:20 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 10:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
Strange, I'll try a rebuild. The former should be the correct location.
Errr...no. The *latter* is the correct location (at least, that's where
the sysroot'ed compiler will look for
On 9/1/2010 23:15, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 11:20 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 10:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
Strange, I'll try a rebuild. The former should be the correct location.
Errr...no. The *latter* is the correct location (at least, that's
On 9/1/2010 11:44 AM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 23:15, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 11:20 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 10:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
Strange, I'll try a rebuild. The former should be the correct
location.
Errr...no. The *latter* is the
On 8/25/2010 12:19 AM, JonY wrote:
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Here are the packages.
Overall comments: I see you reverted to bundling the DLLs with the
compiler packages (e.g. no separate mingw64-x86_64-libfoo-* tarballs).
While
On 9/1/2010 03:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/25/2010 12:19 AM, JonY wrote:
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Here are the packages.
Overall comments: I see you reverted to bundling the DLLs with the
compiler packages (e.g. no separate
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 03:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
Rebuilds fine from source (*), but the binary tarball above is not ok.
It has the headers in the following directory:
usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/
instead of
On 9/1/2010 10:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2010 8:52 PM, JonY wrote:
On 9/1/2010 03:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
Rebuilds fine from source (*), but the binary tarball above is not ok.
It has the headers in the following directory:
On 8/25/2010 8:14 PM, JonY wrote:
On 8/25/2010 12:19, JonY wrote:
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Ping.
Less than a single day is a bit quick to ping.
I'll take a look at this tonight or tomorrow; thanks for your hard work.
--
Chuck
On 8/26/2010 22:21, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/25/2010 8:14 PM, JonY wrote:
On 8/25/2010 12:19, JonY wrote:
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Ping.
Less than a single day is a bit quick to ping.
I'll take a look at this tonight or
On 8/25/2010 12:19, JonY wrote:
Hi,
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Here are the packages.
mingw64-x86_64-pthreads
Hi,
since cygport and gcc has been updated, I can do the packaging without
any local hacks.
Here are the packages.
mingw64-x86_64-pthreads
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-x86_64-pthreads/mingw64-x86_64-pthreads-20100619-1.tar.bz2/download
23 matches
Mail list logo
