Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: >> Botan is not currently using shared libs right now. >> I'm a bit out of my depth here... > > OK, I think I got it: problem is GCC3 wasn't using a shared C++ library > and GCC4 does, and probably that executable has a const pointer to a > something from

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Botan is not currently using shared libs right now. > I'm a bit out of my depth here... OK, I think I got it: problem is GCC3 wasn't using a shared C++ library and GCC4 does, and probably that executable has a const pointer to a something from C++ library that should be reloc

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Lapo Luchini wrote, On 25.3.2009 7:06: > Dave Korn wrote: >> Heh, that's a clue. __Unwind_Resume isn't in cygwin1.dll, it's in >> cyggcc_s-1.dll. We saw this before just recently: remove -lm and -lpthread >> from the final link. > > I removed th

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Dave Korn wrote: > Heh, that's a clue. __Unwind_Resume isn't in cygwin1.dll, it's in > cyggcc_s-1.dll. We saw this before just recently: remove -lm and -lpthread > from the final link. I removed the LINK_TO="-lm -lpthread" generation from the configure.pl but check.exe still fails, this time s

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > A horse for a fix! > > No, hang on, a kingdom for a horse! > > No, wait... Yeh, I'm just about to set up an old 1.5 on a VM using cygwin time machine and try and figure out how it used to work and why it's changed. I didn't want to risk perturbing my main 1.5 insta

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

On Mar 21 11:21, Dave Korn wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > Dave Korn wrote: > >>> BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with > >>> gcc4-4.3.2-2? > >> Well... given that nothing's using it yet, and it's for 1.7, why not save > >> the hassle of an ABI break later? > > > >

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >>> BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with >>> gcc4-4.3.2-2? >> Well... given that nothing's using it yet, and it's for 1.7, why not save >> the hassle of an ABI break later? > > Mhh... unfortunately that seems to break it. > (th

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Dave Korn wrote: >> BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with >> gcc4-4.3.2-2? > > Well... given that nothing's using it yet, and it's for 1.7, why not save > the hassle of an ABI break later? Mhh... unfortunately that seems to break it. (the test-suite executable just

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: >> http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/setup.hint >> http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/botan-1.8.1-1.tar.bz2 >> http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/botan-1.8.1-1-src.tar.bz2 > > BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with > gcc4-4.3.2-2? Well... given

Re: [ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Lapo Luchini wrote: > > http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/setup.hint > http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/botan-1.8.1-1.tar.bz2 > http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/botan-1.8.1-1-src.tar.bz2 BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with gcc4-4.3.2-2? -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/

[ITP-1.7] botan-1.8.1-1

Botan is a portable, easy to use, and efficient C++ crypto library. It's included in Debian , Ubuntu , Fedora, Gentoo, openSUSE, MacPorts, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenPKG, T2 SDE. It will be also needed by up