Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: === - Original Message - From: Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}. Rob Only if files is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel. Otherwise we'd have to traverse the whole set before

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-08 Thread Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)
=== - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Igor's error message patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00017.html Commited. I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}. Rob

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-08 Thread Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)
=== - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Pavel's patch for Exceptions freeing their messages too early http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00176.html Applied. Rob

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-08 Thread Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)
=== - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Pavel's Do not uninstall if upgrade package fails md5 patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00178.html Pavel, This patch was missing IDS_CRC_ERROR definitions, even though it used it. Tsk! I've

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-08 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: === - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Igor's error message patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00017.html Commited. I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}.

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-08 Thread Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)
=== - Original Message - From: Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}. Rob Only if files is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel. Otherwise we'd have to traverse the whole set before we can find the right log file.

Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h

2003-02-25 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Ping?.. Igor On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I've sent this a couple of hours ago, but it didn't appear in the web archive, so I'm resending it. If the original does get through, apologies for the duplicate. On 2 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote: On Sun, [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Collins
Pong?... I'm here, kindof. Just very very busy :[. I've a fair queue of patches now for setup (4 IIRC) to review in my TODO folder. This is one of them. Rob On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 03:50, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Ping?.. Igor On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I've sent

Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-02-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: Pong?... I'm here, kindof. Just very very busy :[. I've a fair queue of patches now for setup (4 IIRC) to review in my TODO folder. Sorry to give you the bad news, but you underestimate: * Remove concat.* In