Re: [RFC] /etc/shells management (fish, mksh, posh, tcsh, zsh)

2016-05-13 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 13 May 2016 at 06:29, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 14:06, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> > On 2016-05-11 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> >>> Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: >> Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in >>

Re: [RFC] /etc/shells management (fish, mksh, posh, tcsh, zsh)

2016-05-13 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On 2016-05-11 14:06, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On 2016-05-11 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote: > >>> Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: > Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in > base-files? > >>> > AFAICS this should be a two-step process. >

Re: [RFC] /etc/shells management (fish, mksh, posh, tcsh, zsh)

2016-05-12 Thread Warren Young
On May 12, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > What are the consequences of having shells listed in /etc/shells which aren't > on the system? That file is a security feature, but the typical way Cygwin works — i.e. that normal users are allowed to install

[RFC] /etc/shells management (fish, mksh, posh, tcsh, zsh)

2016-05-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-05-11 14:06, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote: Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in base-files? I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could