Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 13 16:54, Warren Young wrote: Would someone flip this package from test to curr for me, please? Leave 3.7.16.2-1 as prev. Done. Do you want to keep 3.7.13-1? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-14 Thread Warren Young
On 6/14/2013 01:54, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 13 16:54, Warren Young wrote: Would someone flip this package from test to curr for me, please? Leave 3.7.16.2-1 as prev. Done. Thanks! Do you want to keep 3.7.13-1? I didn't know I could have more than one prev. Sure, let's keep it a

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-13 Thread Warren Young
Would someone flip this package from test to curr for me, please? Leave 3.7.16.2-1 as prev.

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-11 Thread marco atzeri
Il 6/10/2013 9:55 PM, Warren Young ha scritto: Leave 3.7.16.2-1 as curr, and make this test only for now. you should make it test adding the relevant prev/current/test entries as specified on http://cygwin.com/setup.html (I am hoping to be able to promote it to curr later, but it changes

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-11 Thread Warren Young
On 6/11/2013 01:37, marco atzeri wrote: you should make it test adding the relevant prev/current/test entries as specified on http://cygwin.com/setup.html Is there a way to set this via the .cygport file? I tried searching its HTML manual, and didn't find one. The alternative is to

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-11 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/11/2013 10:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: On 6/11/2013 01:37, marco atzeri wrote: you should make it test adding the relevant prev/current/test entries as specified on http://cygwin.com/setup.html Is there a way to set this via the .cygport file? I tried searching its HTML manual, and

[RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-10 Thread Warren Young
Leave 3.7.16.2-1 as curr, and make this test only for now. (I am hoping to be able to promote it to curr later, but it changes too much to risk that without more testing. The only reason I'm RFU'ing it is because there seems to be some resistance to installing test versions from raw