At 06:11 AM 7/20/2003 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
I've just posted an *official* new release of gdbm to the main list. I
reverted my entire system to 1.3.22 status (no test packages at all), and
rebuilt gdbm with Pierre's programs. That's the new, curr: release
(1.8.3-3)
Then, I moved forward
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Given that 1.8.3-3 and 1.8.3-4 contain incompatible dlls, isn't the
tradition to name the packages differently and have them coexist in
setup for a while (without default upgrading when in non-test mode)?
That way old applications can keep working when gdbm is updated
At 11:32 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Given that 1.8.3-3 and 1.8.3-4 contain incompatible dlls, isn't the
tradition to name the packages differently and have them coexist in
setup for a while (without default upgrading when in non-test mode)?
That
Okay, thanks to Pierre's contributions, we may have a solution for
gdbm...
I've just posted an *official* new release of gdbm to the main list. I
reverted my entire system to 1.3.22 status (no test packages at all), and
rebuilt gdbm with Pierre's programs. That's the new, curr: release
