Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-12 Thread Stipe Tolj
Daniel Reed schrieb: If this is a major difference, you might do better having the package itself be named apache-eapi, and leaving the documentation scheme unmodified (so your documentation would be in usr/share/doc/apache-eapi-1.3.29-1/). The convention is to use

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-12 Thread Stipe Tolj
Larry Hall schrieb: I'd say if it's important enough to mention in the package name somehow, then it's a new package and so the name (rather the version info) should change. The result would be a new apache-eapi package replacing the traditional apache package. I'm not sure this really

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Stipe Tolj
Stipe Tolj wrote: ok, another version including the security bugfix and the note of the change from -k to -F option switch for keeping the main httpd process attached to the calling shell has been uploaded for review. please check and review. Same location as before at:

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Stipe == Stipe Tolj writes: Stipe Stipe Tolj wrote: Stipe ok, anyone having a chance to look into this? ... or is this now the Stipe Stipe boycotting fraction out there? ;) ... come on guys, I want to Stipe roll the mod_foobar packages too. The binary seems to work fine. I just

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Stipe Tolj
Dr. Volker Zell schrieb: The binary seems to work fine. I just checked with static and cgi-stuff. Hadn't have to time build from source yet. But I'm trying this evening ok, I'll go ahead and prepare the mod_foobar packages. At least the simpler ones. php is about to follow then. (this will be

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Stipe == Stipe Tolj writes: Stipe Dr. Volker Zell schrieb: The binary seems to work fine. I just checked with static and cgi-stuff. Hadn't have to time build from source yet. But I'm trying this evening Done The build from source according to the installation

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2004-02-10T18:40+0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: ) Done The build from source according to the installation ) instructions works fine. GTG from me. Alright, I have uploaded this new Apache package. Offhand the Cygwin-specific README is misnamed (usr/share/doc/Cygwin/apache-1.3.29-1.README

Re: [UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-10 Thread Stipe Tolj
Daniel Reed wrote: On 2004-02-10T18:40+0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: ) Done The build from source according to the installation ) instructions works fine. GTG from me. Alright, I have uploaded this new Apache package. Offhand the Cygwin-specific README is misnamed

[UPDATE] apache-1.3.29-2 repackaged (incl. security fix)

2004-02-09 Thread Stipe Tolj
ok, another version including the security bugfix and the note of the change from -k to -F option switch for keeping the main httpd process attached to the calling shell has been uploaded for review. please check and review. Same location as before at: